LeetCode Problem Workspace
Distinct Echo Substrings
Count the distinct non-empty substrings of a given string that can be formed as the concatenation of a string with itself.
4
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · String plus Trie
Answer-first summary
Count the distinct non-empty substrings of a given string that can be formed as the concatenation of a string with itself.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for String plus Trie
This problem requires identifying distinct substrings that can be written as the concatenation of a string with itself. The approach involves leveraging string properties and possibly rolling hashes. A Trie can help efficiently store and check substrings.
Problem Statement
Given a string text, you are tasked with returning the number of distinct non-empty substrings that can be expressed as a concatenation of some string with itself (i.e., as a + a, where a is a substring).
For example, in the string abcabcabc, the distinct echo substrings are "abcabc", "bcabca", and "cabcab". This problem requires efficient handling of substring matching using string and Trie-based methods.
Examples
Example 1
Input: text = "abcabcabc"
Output: 3
The 3 substrings are "abcabc", "bcabca" and "cabcab".
Example 2
Input: text = "leetcodeleetcode"
Output: 2
The 2 substrings are "ee" and "leetcodeleetcode".
Constraints
- 1 <= text.length <= 2000
- text has only lowercase English letters.
Solution Approach
String Matching with Trie
You can use a Trie to store substrings and efficiently check if they can be written as a concatenation of a string with itself. By building substrings iteratively, the Trie allows quick matching and insertion.
Rolling Hash for Efficient Substring Comparison
A rolling hash technique can be used to compute hash values of substrings in constant time, making substring comparisons faster and allowing you to check for repeated substrings efficiently.
Iterating Over Substrings
To ensure all substrings are examined, iterate over all possible starting points in the string, generating and checking substrings. Using a hash set or Trie will allow you to track distinct substrings.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time and space complexities depend on the approach chosen. For the Trie-based solution, it involves storing substrings, leading to time complexity near O(n^2) where n is the length of the string. The space complexity is also O(n^2) due to storage requirements for all substrings.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- The candidate should demonstrate a strong grasp of string manipulation techniques like Trie usage and rolling hashes.
- Look for understanding of how to handle distinct substrings efficiently.
- Pay attention to how they balance time complexity with space usage, especially in terms of optimizing substring checks.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to account for overlapping substrings that are distinct but share characters, which can lead to incorrect results.
- Not considering edge cases like very short strings or strings with only one character repeated multiple times.
- Overcomplicating the problem by not optimizing substring checking, leading to poor performance for larger inputs.
Follow-up variants
- Consider handling strings with uppercase letters or non-alphabetical characters.
- Expand to handle substrings that can be written as multiple concatenations of a string, not just two.
- Extend the problem to find the longest echo substring instead of just counting them.
FAQ
What is a distinct echo substring?
A distinct echo substring is a non-empty substring that can be written as the concatenation of a string with itself, such as 'abcabc'.
What approach should I use to find distinct echo substrings?
You can use a combination of Trie data structures and rolling hashes for efficient substring comparison and checking.
How can I optimize the space complexity for this problem?
Using a rolling hash technique or compressing substring storage can help reduce space complexity while still allowing efficient checks for distinct substrings.
What is the time complexity of the Trie-based approach for this problem?
The time complexity of a Trie-based approach is O(n^2), where n is the length of the string, due to storing and checking all possible substrings.
How does GhostInterview help with this problem?
GhostInterview provides tailored approaches and algorithmic strategies to efficiently find distinct echo substrings using advanced data structures and hashing techniques.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
class Solution:
def distinctEchoSubstrings(self, text: str) -> int:
def get(l, r):
return (h[r] - h[l - 1] * p[r - l + 1]) % mod
n = len(text)
base = 131
mod = int(1e9) + 7
h = [0] * (n + 10)
p = [1] * (n + 10)
for i, c in enumerate(text):
t = ord(c) - ord('a') + 1
h[i + 1] = (h[i] * base) % mod + t
p[i + 1] = (p[i] * base) % mod
vis = set()
for i in range(n - 1):
for j in range(i + 1, n, 2):
k = (i + j) >> 1
a = get(i + 1, k + 1)
b = get(k + 2, j + 1)
if a == b:
vis.add(a)
return len(vis)Continue Topic
string
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
String plus Trie
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward