LeetCode Problem Workspace
Count Subarrays With Fixed Bounds
Count all subarrays where the minimum and maximum match given bounds using efficient sliding window tracking techniques.
4
Topics
7
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · Sliding window with running state updates
Answer-first summary
Count all subarrays where the minimum and maximum match given bounds using efficient sliding window tracking techniques.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Sliding window with running state updates
Use a sliding window to track the most recent positions of minK, maxK, and invalid elements. Expand the window across the array while updating counts whenever both bounds are present without invalid numbers. This method ensures O(n) traversal and avoids redundant checks, directly connecting to the sliding window with running state updates pattern.
Problem Statement
Given an integer array nums and two integers minK and maxK, count all subarrays where the smallest element equals minK and the largest equals maxK. Only contiguous subarrays that satisfy these bounds are valid.
Return the total number of fixed-bound subarrays. Each subarray must include at least one minK and one maxK, and all elements must stay within minK and maxK. Examples: for nums = [1,3,5,2,7,5] with minK = 1 and maxK = 5, the valid subarrays are [1,3,5] and [1,3,5,2].
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [1,3,5,2,7,5], minK = 1, maxK = 5
Output: 2
The fixed-bound subarrays are [1,3,5] and [1,3,5,2].
Example 2
Input: nums = [1,1,1,1], minK = 1, maxK = 1
Output: 10
Every subarray of nums is a fixed-bound subarray. There are 10 possible subarrays.
Constraints
- 2 <= nums.length <= 105
- 1 <= nums[i], minK, maxK <= 106
Solution Approach
Sliding Window with Last Seen Indices
Track the last indices of minK, maxK, and the last element outside bounds. For each position, calculate how many subarrays end at the current index using the minimum distance to the last invalid or bound index.
Incremental Count Update
Instead of enumerating all subarrays, incrementally add counts by extending the window. Each step considers only new subarrays ending at the current element and ensures both minK and maxK are included.
Edge Case Handling
Carefully handle sequences where elements equal minK or maxK multiple times. Reset counts after encountering numbers outside the bounds to avoid counting invalid subarrays, preserving the integrity of the sliding window state.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n) as each element is visited once with constant-time updates for last seen indices. Space complexity is O(1) since only a few indices are stored, independent of array size.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Can you do this in one pass using a sliding window?
- Consider how to track last positions of minK, maxK, and invalid elements efficiently.
- Check edge cases where minK equals maxK or repeated numbers appear.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting to reset when encountering an out-of-bound element.
- Incorrectly counting subarrays when minK or maxK repeats.
- Assuming all subarrays with minK and maxK are valid without checking intermediate elements.
Follow-up variants
- Count subarrays where elements are within a dynamic range instead of fixed bounds.
- Compute sum of lengths of fixed-bound subarrays instead of count.
- Handle multiple pairs of minK and maxK for a single pass solution.
FAQ
What is a fixed-bound subarray in Count Subarrays With Fixed Bounds?
A subarray where the smallest element is minK, the largest is maxK, and all elements stay within these bounds.
How does the sliding window pattern apply here?
It tracks last seen minK, maxK, and invalid indices, allowing O(n) counting of valid subarrays without full enumeration.
Can this handle repeated minK or maxK elements?
Yes, GhostInterview maintains last seen indices to correctly count subarrays even with repeated bounds.
What should I watch out for when implementing?
Reset the window after any element outside minK-maxK to avoid counting invalid subarrays.
Why is this approach better than brute force?
Brute force checks all subarrays, giving O(n^2) time; sliding window with state tracking reduces it to O(n).
Solution
Solution 1: Enumerate the Right Endpoint
According to the problem description, we know that all elements of a bounded subarray are within the range $[\textit{minK}, \textit{maxK}]$, and the minimum value must be $\textit{minK}$, while the maximum value must be $\textit{maxK}$.
class Solution:
def countSubarrays(self, nums: List[int], minK: int, maxK: int) -> int:
j1 = j2 = k = -1
ans = 0
for i, v in enumerate(nums):
if v < minK or v > maxK:
k = i
if v == minK:
j1 = i
if v == maxK:
j2 = i
ans += max(0, min(j1, j2) - k)
return ansContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Sliding window with running state updates
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward