LeetCode Problem Workspace
Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements
Minimize the difference between sums after removing n elements from a 3n array by dividing the remaining elements into two parts.
3
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Minimize the difference between sums after removing n elements from a 3n array by dividing the remaining elements into two parts.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
To solve this problem, we focus on removing a subsequence of n elements and splitting the remaining 2n elements into two parts. Using dynamic programming and heaps, the goal is to find the minimum possible difference in sums of these two parts.
Problem Statement
You are given an integer array nums consisting of 3 * n elements. You need to remove any subsequence of exactly n elements, and then divide the remaining 2 * n elements into two equal parts. The difference in sums of the two parts is denoted as sumfirst - sumsecond.
Return the minimum possible difference between the sums of the two parts after removing n elements from nums. The challenge is to find a solution that efficiently minimizes this difference using dynamic programming and heaps.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [3,1,2]
Output: -1
Here, nums has 3 elements, so n = 1. Thus we have to remove 1 element from nums and divide the array into two equal parts.
- If we remove nums[0] = 3, the array will be [1,2]. The difference in sums of the two parts will be 1 - 2 = -1.
- If we remove nums[1] = 1, the array will be [3,2]. The difference in sums of the two parts will be 3 - 2 = 1.
- If we remove nums[2] = 2, the array will be [3,1]. The difference in sums of the two parts will be 3 - 1 = 2. The minimum difference between sums of the two parts is min(-1,1,2) = -1.
Example 2
Input: nums = [7,9,5,8,1,3]
Output: 1
Here n = 2. So we must remove 2 elements and divide the remaining array into two parts containing two elements each. If we remove nums[2] = 5 and nums[3] = 8, the resultant array will be [7,9,1,3]. The difference in sums will be (7+9) - (1+3) = 12. To obtain the minimum difference, we should remove nums[1] = 9 and nums[4] = 1. The resultant array becomes [7,5,8,3]. The difference in sums of the two parts is (7+5) - (8+3) = 1. It can be shown that it is not possible to obtain a difference smaller than 1.
Constraints
- nums.length == 3 * n
- 1 <= n <= 105
- 1 <= nums[i] <= 105
Solution Approach
State Transition Dynamic Programming
The problem can be modeled as a state transition dynamic programming problem. You iterate through the possible subsequences to remove, calculating the sums of the remaining elements and adjusting them accordingly.
Use of Heaps
Heaps can be used to efficiently manage the largest and smallest elements in the array. By using a min-heap for the smaller part and a max-heap for the larger part, we can easily adjust the sums as we try different subsequences to remove.
Optimization and Final Calculation
After determining the subsequences to remove and splitting the remaining array into two parts, the final step involves calculating the difference in sums and optimizing the solution by selecting the minimum difference possible.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n \log n) |
| Space | O(n) |
The time complexity is O(n log n) due to the heap operations involved in managing the elements during the dynamic programming transitions. The space complexity is O(n) due to the space required for the heaps and state tracking.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Tests the candidate's ability to apply dynamic programming with state transitions.
- Evaluates the candidate's knowledge of heap operations for optimizing subarray sum calculations.
- Checks the ability to optimize performance for large input sizes (up to 3 * 10^5 elements).
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting to handle the edge case where n is very small or large.
- Inefficient heap usage which could cause time complexity to exceed the limit.
- Incorrect partitioning of the remaining elements after removing the subsequence.
Follow-up variants
- Variation with a constraint on the value of n for additional optimization challenges.
- Problem with multiple possible subsequences to remove, requiring additional considerations for efficiency.
- Variant that requires splitting the array into more than two parts instead of two.
FAQ
What is the core pattern for solving the Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements problem?
The core pattern is state transition dynamic programming combined with heap operations to manage and optimize subarray sum calculations.
How can heaps be useful in solving the problem?
Heaps allow us to efficiently manage the largest and smallest elements of the remaining array, helping in minimizing the sum difference.
Why is dynamic programming essential for this problem?
Dynamic programming helps by efficiently tracking and calculating the sums after removing subsequences, reducing the problem's complexity.
What time complexity can I expect when solving the problem?
The expected time complexity is O(n log n), primarily due to heap operations during the state transitions.
How can I handle edge cases in the Minimum Difference in Sums After Removal of Elements problem?
Ensure correct handling of small and large values of n, and be mindful of the heap and partitioning operations during dynamic programming transitions.
Solution
Solution 1: Priority Queue (Max and Min Heap) + Prefix and Suffix Sum + Enumeration of Split Points
The problem is essentially equivalent to finding a split point in $nums$, dividing the array into two parts. In the first part, select the smallest $n$ elements, and in the second part, select the largest $n$ elements, so that the difference between the sums of the two parts is minimized.
class Solution:
def minimumDifference(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
m = len(nums)
n = m // 3
s = 0
pre = [0] * (m + 1)
q1 = []
for i, x in enumerate(nums[: n * 2], 1):
s += x
heappush(q1, -x)
if len(q1) > n:
s -= -heappop(q1)
pre[i] = s
s = 0
suf = [0] * (m + 1)
q2 = []
for i in range(m, n, -1):
x = nums[i - 1]
s += x
heappush(q2, x)
if len(q2) > n:
s -= heappop(q2)
suf[i] = s
return min(pre[i] - suf[i + 1] for i in range(n, n * 2 + 1))Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward