LeetCode Problem Workspace
Maximum Performance of a Team
Maximize the performance of a team by selecting up to k engineers with the highest performance based on speed and efficiency.
4
Topics
4
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · Greedy choice plus invariant validation
Answer-first summary
Maximize the performance of a team by selecting up to k engineers with the highest performance based on speed and efficiency.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Greedy choice plus invariant validation
The problem asks for selecting up to k engineers from a given list to maximize the team's performance. Performance is calculated as the sum of selected engineers' speeds multiplied by the minimum efficiency among them. A greedy approach is used to solve this problem by sorting engineers by efficiency and keeping track of their speeds.
Problem Statement
You are given two integer arrays, speed and efficiency, each of length n, representing the speeds and efficiencies of n engineers. You are also given an integer k, which represents the maximum number of engineers that can be selected to form a team. Your task is to select a subset of at most k engineers to maximize the team's performance.
The performance of a team is calculated as the sum of the speeds of the selected engineers, multiplied by the minimum efficiency of those engineers. The goal is to select the k engineers that maximize this value. To achieve this, a greedy approach is used by sorting the engineers by efficiency in descending order.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 6, speed = [2,10,3,1,5,8], efficiency = [5,4,3,9,7,2], k = 2
Output: 60
We have the maximum performance of the team by selecting engineer 2 (with speed=10 and efficiency=4) and engineer 5 (with speed=5 and efficiency=7). That is, performance = (10 + 5) * min(4, 7) = 60.
Example 2
Input: n = 6, speed = [2,10,3,1,5,8], efficiency = [5,4,3,9,7,2], k = 3
Output: 68
This is the same example as the first but k = 3. We can select engineer 1, engineer 2 and engineer 5 to get the maximum performance of the team. That is, performance = (2 + 10 + 5) * min(5, 4, 7) = 68.
Example 3
Input: n = 6, speed = [2,10,3,1,5,8], efficiency = [5,4,3,9,7,2], k = 4
Output: 72
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= k <= n <= 105
- speed.length == n
- efficiency.length == n
- 1 <= speed[i] <= 105
- 1 <= efficiency[i] <= 108
Solution Approach
Sort engineers by efficiency
Sort the engineers in decreasing order based on their efficiency. This ensures that when engineers are selected, the team is always formed with the highest efficiency first, maximizing the potential performance.
Use a min-heap for speed sum
Maintain a min-heap to keep track of the engineers' speeds. As engineers are added, the heap ensures that we always have the k engineers with the highest total speed, as long as we don't exceed the limit of k engineers.
Calculate performance dynamically
For each engineer added, calculate the performance dynamically by multiplying the sum of the speeds by the current minimum efficiency. Keep track of the maximum performance encountered.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity is dominated by the sorting step, which is O(n log n), and the heap operations, which are O(log k). Thus, the overall time complexity is O(n log n). The space complexity is O(k) due to the min-heap storing up to k engineers' speeds at a time.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Tests understanding of greedy algorithms and invariant maintenance.
- Assesses ability to optimize performance while handling large inputs.
- Evaluates proficiency with heap data structures for efficient selection and tracking.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not maintaining the correct number of engineers in the heap, which can lead to incorrect performance calculations.
- Failing to sort the engineers by efficiency in decreasing order, which could lead to suboptimal selections.
- Overcomplicating the problem by not recognizing the importance of a greedy choice in maximizing performance.
Follow-up variants
- The problem could involve different performance formulas, such as weighted averages or more complex functions of speed and efficiency.
- Instead of k engineers, you might need to select the best team given a fixed budget or constraints on individual engineer costs.
- Consider an extended version where the engineers have different skill levels or other attributes affecting the performance calculation.
FAQ
How do I approach the Maximum Performance of a Team problem?
Use a greedy approach by sorting engineers by efficiency and tracking the highest speeds using a min-heap.
What is the time complexity of the Maximum Performance of a Team problem?
The time complexity is O(n log n), dominated by the sorting step and heap operations.
How do I ensure the team performance is maximized in this problem?
Maximize the team performance by always selecting engineers with the highest efficiencies and speeds, ensuring the sum of speeds is optimal for the minimum efficiency.
What is the primary pattern used to solve this problem?
This problem uses a greedy choice combined with invariant validation, focusing on maximizing team performance based on sorted efficiencies and a heap for speed tracking.
What is the role of the min-heap in the solution?
The min-heap helps track the sum of the selected engineers' speeds, ensuring that the k engineers with the highest total speed are selected at each step.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
class Solution:
def maxPerformance(
self, n: int, speed: List[int], efficiency: List[int], k: int
) -> int:
t = sorted(zip(speed, efficiency), key=lambda x: -x[1])
ans = tot = 0
mod = 10**9 + 7
h = []
for s, e in t:
tot += s
ans = max(ans, tot * e)
heappush(h, s)
if len(h) == k:
tot -= heappop(h)
return ans % modContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Greedy choice plus invariant validation
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward