LeetCode Problem Workspace
Find Resultant Array After Removing Anagrams
This problem requires removing adjacent anagrams from a list of words using an array scanning and hash lookup approach.
4
Topics
7
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Easy · Array scanning plus hash lookup
Answer-first summary
This problem requires removing adjacent anagrams from a list of words using an array scanning and hash lookup approach.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array scanning plus hash lookup
To solve this problem, scan through the array and remove adjacent anagrams by checking each word against the previous one. Using a hash map can help to efficiently detect anagrams. This method works by comparing sorted versions of the strings or using a frequency count approach.
Problem Statement
You are given a 0-indexed string array words, where words[i] consists of lowercase English letters. In one operation, you can remove an element from the array if it is an anagram of the previous element. The operation should be repeated as long as any two consecutive elements are anagrams. The task is to return the array after performing all operations.
The order of removal does not matter, as performing the operations in any order will yield the same result. Your goal is to return the resulting array with no adjacent anagrams.
Examples
Example 1
Input: words = ["abba","baba","bbaa","cd","cd"]
Output: ["abba","cd"]
One of the ways we can obtain the resultant array is by using the following operations:
- Since words[2] = "bbaa" and words[1] = "baba" are anagrams, we choose index 2 and delete words[2]. Now words = ["abba","baba","cd","cd"].
- Since words[1] = "baba" and words[0] = "abba" are anagrams, we choose index 1 and delete words[1]. Now words = ["abba","cd","cd"].
- Since words[2] = "cd" and words[1] = "cd" are anagrams, we choose index 2 and delete words[2]. Now words = ["abba","cd"]. We can no longer perform any operations, so ["abba","cd"] is the final answer.
Example 2
Input: words = ["a","b","c","d","e"]
Output: ["a","b","c","d","e"]
No two adjacent strings in words are anagrams of each other, so no operations are performed.
Constraints
- 1 <= words.length <= 100
- 1 <= words[i].length <= 10
- words[i] consists of lowercase English letters.
Solution Approach
Array Scanning with Hashmap
Scan through the array from left to right, and for each word, check if it is an anagram of the previous one by using a hash map or frequency counter. If the words are anagrams, remove the current word.
Sorting Approach
Sort the characters of each word and compare them. If two adjacent words have the same sorted version, they are anagrams, and the latter word can be removed.
Optimal Lookup Strategy
Instead of sorting the strings, use a frequency count to detect anagrams more efficiently. Compare the character frequencies of two adjacent words and remove the word if they match.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity of this problem depends on the method used. Sorting each word takes O(k log k) time, where k is the length of the word, and this operation is done for every word in the list. The space complexity depends on the approach, with the hash map method requiring O(k) space for each word's character frequency.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Understanding of array scanning techniques and hash map usage.
- Efficiency in detecting anagrams using frequency counts or sorting.
- Ability to optimize for space and time complexity while solving.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to recognize the need for an efficient anagram check (sorting or hash map).
- Not handling edge cases, like when no words are anagrams.
- Overcomplicating the solution with unnecessary operations or data structures.
Follow-up variants
- Allowing for a custom comparator instead of using frequency counts.
- Modifying the input in place without using extra space.
- Handling case sensitivity or extending the problem to a larger character set.
FAQ
What is the optimal way to check if two words are anagrams?
The most efficient way to check for anagrams is to use a frequency count of characters or to sort both strings and compare them.
How does this problem relate to the Array, Hash Table, and String topics?
This problem involves scanning through an array, using a hash table to store character frequencies or sorted versions of words, and dealing with strings in the process.
Can this problem be solved in-place?
Yes, it can be solved in-place by modifying the input array as you process the elements.
What is the time complexity of this problem?
The time complexity depends on the approach. Sorting each word would result in O(n * k log k), where n is the number of words and k is the length of the words. The hash map approach can be more efficient with a time complexity of O(n * k).
What are the common mistakes in solving this problem?
Common mistakes include failing to check for adjacent anagrams properly, overcomplicating the solution with unnecessary sorting, or not considering edge cases.
Solution
Solution 1: Simulation
We first add $\textit{words}[0]$ to the answer array, then traverse from $\textit{words}[1]$. If $\textit{words}[i - 1]$ and $\textit{words}[i]$ are not anagrams, we add $\textit{words}[i]$ to the answer array.
class Solution:
def removeAnagrams(self, words: List[str]) -> List[str]:
def check(s: str, t: str) -> bool:
if len(s) != len(t):
return True
cnt = Counter(s)
for c in t:
cnt[c] -= 1
if cnt[c] < 0:
return True
return False
return [words[0]] + [t for s, t in pairwise(words) if check(s, t)]Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array scanning plus hash lookup
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Easy
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward