LeetCode Problem Workspace
Count Subtrees With Max Distance Between Cities
This problem asks you to count subtrees in a tree structure where the maximum distance between any two cities matches specific values.
5
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · Binary-tree traversal and state tracking
Answer-first summary
This problem asks you to count subtrees in a tree structure where the maximum distance between any two cities matches specific values.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Binary-tree traversal and state tracking
In this problem, you are given a tree of cities and asked to count the number of subtrees with a specific maximum distance between any two cities. This requires an approach that leverages binary-tree traversal and state tracking, where you iterate through possible subtrees using bitmasking to determine which nodes are included. The challenge lies in efficiently tracking and verifying valid subtrees based on the distances between the cities in them.
Problem Statement
You are given a tree with n cities, each numbered from 1 to n. The tree is described by an array of edges where each edge connects two cities, forming a bidirectional path. The tree structure ensures there is a unique path between any pair of cities. Your task is to count how many subtrees have a specific maximum distance between any two cities. A subtree consists of any subset of cities that are connected within themselves.
For each distance d from 1 to n-1, determine how many subtrees have the maximum distance between any two cities in the subtree equal to d. The key challenge is to efficiently count these subtrees using dynamic programming and bitmasking techniques while ensuring each subtree's validity by tracking the maximum distance between the cities in the subset.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 4, edges = [[1,2],[2,3],[2,4]]
Output: [3,4,0]
The subtrees with subsets {1,2}, {2,3} and {2,4} have a max distance of 1.
The subtrees with subsets {1,2,3}, {1,2,4}, {2,3,4} and {1,2,3,4} have a max distance of 2.
No subtree has two nodes where the max distance between them is 3.
Example 2
Input: n = 2, edges = [[1,2]]
Output: [1]
Example details omitted.
Example 3
Input: n = 3, edges = [[1,2],[2,3]]
Output: [2,1]
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 2 <= n <= 15
- edges.length == n-1
- edges[i].length == 2
- 1 <= ui, vi <= n
- All pairs (ui, vi) are distinct.
Solution Approach
Bitmasking to Iterate Over All Subtrees
Use bitmasking to represent every possible subset of cities. This allows you to efficiently generate all possible subtrees and track which cities are included in each subset. For each bitmask, check if the subset of cities forms a valid subtree and calculate the maximum distance between cities in that subtree.
Dynamic Programming for Subtree Distance Calculation
Implement dynamic programming to calculate the maximum distance between cities in each valid subtree. As you iterate over each possible subtree, store precomputed values to avoid redundant calculations. This improves the efficiency of the algorithm, especially when working with a larger number of cities.
Optimization for Valid Subtree Validation
For each generated subtree, determine if it is valid by checking if all cities in the subset are connected. This can be done using depth-first search (DFS) or breadth-first search (BFS) to ensure the subset of cities forms a connected graph. If valid, calculate the maximum distance between any two cities in the subtree.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time and space complexity of this solution depend on the number of cities n. Using bitmasking, you need to consider all subsets of cities, which takes O(2^n) time. For each subset, you must check the maximum distance between cities, which requires traversing the tree. The space complexity is determined by the number of subtrees and the space needed for dynamic programming states.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Look for the candidate's understanding of bitmasking and dynamic programming techniques.
- Assess the candidate's ability to handle tree traversal efficiently within constraints.
- Evaluate their ability to optimize the algorithm, especially considering time and space complexity.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not efficiently managing the bitmasking process and trying to iterate through all subsets without considering optimizations.
- Failing to validate whether a subset forms a connected graph before calculating the maximum distance between cities.
- Overlooking the importance of dynamic programming in storing precomputed values to avoid redundant calculations.
Follow-up variants
- Increase the number of cities to test the scalability of the solution.
- Consider additional constraints such as weighted edges or directed edges to modify the problem.
- Modify the problem to count subtrees with a fixed number of cities and a maximum distance limit.
FAQ
What is the pattern for solving 'Count Subtrees With Max Distance Between Cities'?
The pattern revolves around binary-tree traversal and state tracking, specifically using bitmasking and dynamic programming to efficiently find subtrees and their maximum distances.
How do I use bitmasking for this problem?
Bitmasking is used to represent every possible subset of cities, which helps in efficiently iterating over potential subtrees and checking their validity and maximum distance.
How do I determine if a subtree is valid?
To determine if a subtree is valid, check if all cities in the subset are connected. This can be done using DFS or BFS to ensure the subset forms a valid tree structure.
What is the time complexity of this approach?
The time complexity is O(2^n * n), where n is the number of cities. This comes from iterating over all subsets using bitmasking and performing a tree traversal for each subset.
Can this problem be optimized further?
Yes, further optimizations can be achieved by reducing redundant calculations using dynamic programming and efficiently managing the bitmasking process.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
class Solution:
def countSubgraphsForEachDiameter(
self, n: int, edges: List[List[int]]
) -> List[int]:
def dfs(u: int, d: int = 0):
nonlocal mx, nxt, msk
if mx < d:
mx, nxt = d, u
msk ^= 1 << u
for v in g[u]:
if msk >> v & 1:
dfs(v, d + 1)
g = defaultdict(list)
for u, v in edges:
u, v = u - 1, v - 1
g[u].append(v)
g[v].append(u)
ans = [0] * (n - 1)
nxt = mx = 0
for mask in range(1, 1 << n):
if mask & (mask - 1) == 0:
continue
msk, mx = mask, 0
cur = msk.bit_length() - 1
dfs(cur)
if msk == 0:
msk, mx = mask, 0
dfs(nxt)
ans[mx - 1] += 1
return ansSolution 2
#### Python3
class Solution:
def countSubgraphsForEachDiameter(
self, n: int, edges: List[List[int]]
) -> List[int]:
def dfs(u: int, d: int = 0):
nonlocal mx, nxt, msk
if mx < d:
mx, nxt = d, u
msk ^= 1 << u
for v in g[u]:
if msk >> v & 1:
dfs(v, d + 1)
g = defaultdict(list)
for u, v in edges:
u, v = u - 1, v - 1
g[u].append(v)
g[v].append(u)
ans = [0] * (n - 1)
nxt = mx = 0
for mask in range(1, 1 << n):
if mask & (mask - 1) == 0:
continue
msk, mx = mask, 0
cur = msk.bit_length() - 1
dfs(cur)
if msk == 0:
msk, mx = mask, 0
dfs(nxt)
ans[mx - 1] += 1
return ansContinue Topic
dynamic programming
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Binary-tree traversal and state tracking
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward