LeetCode Problem Workspace
Shortest Distance After Road Addition Queries II
The problem involves calculating the shortest path from city 0 to city n-1 after each road addition, leveraging greedy choices.
4
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · Greedy choice plus invariant validation
Answer-first summary
The problem involves calculating the shortest path from city 0 to city n-1 after each road addition, leveraging greedy choices.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Greedy choice plus invariant validation
This problem focuses on calculating the shortest path from city 0 to city n-1 after each road addition. The solution requires validating greedy choices, ensuring the path optimization after each query efficiently. Implementing graph updates with optimal performance is crucial to avoid timeouts in large inputs.
Problem Statement
You are given an integer n representing the number of cities numbered from 0 to n-1. Initially, there is a unidirectional road from city i to city i + 1 for all 0 <= i < n - 1.
For each query [ui, vi], a new unidirectional road from city ui to city vi is added. After each road addition, you need to calculate the shortest path from city 0 to city n-1 and output the result.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 5, queries = [[2,4],[0,2],[0,4]]
Output: [3,2,1]
After the addition of the road from 2 to 4, the length of the shortest path from 0 to 4 is 3.
After the addition of the road from 0 to 2, the length of the shortest path from 0 to 4 is 2.
After the addition of the road from 0 to 4, the length of the shortest path from 0 to 4 is 1.
Example 2
Input: n = 4, queries = [[0,3],[0,2]]
Output: [1,1]
After the addition of the road from 0 to 3, the length of the shortest path from 0 to 3 is 1.
After the addition of the road from 0 to 2, the length of the shortest path remains 1.
Constraints
- 3 <= n <= 105
- 1 <= queries.length <= 105
- queries[i].length == 2
- 0 <= queries[i][0] < queries[i][1] < n
- 1 < queries[i][1] - queries[i][0]
- There are no repeated roads among the queries.
- There are no two queries such that i != j and queries[i][0] < queries[j][0] < queries[i][1] < queries[j][1].
Solution Approach
Graph Representation with Optimized Updates
Represent the cities and roads as a graph, initially having a direct road from each city i to i + 1. As each query is processed, update the graph efficiently and calculate the shortest path using a greedy approach to minimize traversal cost.
Greedy Path Optimization with Invariant Validation
After each road addition, check for the shortest valid path from city 0 to city n-1. Greedily validate the effect of the newly added road by checking how it reduces the distance. Invariant validation ensures that each addition is processed optimally.
Efficient Path Calculation with Priority Queue
Utilize a priority queue to track the shortest distance dynamically as roads are added. This helps efficiently compute the shortest path after each road addition without recomputing all paths from scratch.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity of the solution depends on how the graph is updated and how the shortest path is recalculated after each query. Efficient graph traversal using priority queues or Union-Find can reduce the time complexity significantly. Space complexity depends on the number of cities and roads, which may grow dynamically with the queries.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Check if the candidate can handle graph traversal problems with dynamic updates.
- Look for understanding of greedy algorithms and how they can be applied to graph-related problems.
- Assess how efficiently the candidate manages graph updates to avoid excessive recomputation.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not updating the graph efficiently, leading to redundant recalculations of the shortest path.
- Forgetting to optimize the process for larger inputs, leading to timeouts.
- Misunderstanding the greedy choice strategy, which may result in suboptimal path calculations.
Follow-up variants
- Add more roads at once rather than one at a time, requiring batch processing.
- Allow roads to be bi-directional, adding complexity to the shortest path calculations.
- Introduce more constraints such as varying road lengths, instead of assuming unit length roads.
FAQ
What is the core pattern of the Shortest Distance After Road Addition Queries II problem?
The core pattern is greedy choice optimization combined with invariant validation, where each road addition optimally adjusts the shortest path.
How do I efficiently update the graph in Shortest Distance After Road Addition Queries II?
You can update the graph efficiently using priority queues or dynamic Union-Find data structures, which help manage graph changes after each query.
What is the time complexity of solving this problem?
The time complexity depends on the graph update and shortest path calculation method. Efficient implementations using priority queues or Union-Find can reduce complexity significantly.
What makes this problem different from a standard shortest path problem?
This problem involves dynamically updating the graph after each query, requiring an approach that efficiently recalculates the shortest path without recomputing from scratch.
Can the solution be optimized further for larger inputs?
Yes, using priority queues or advanced graph algorithms can optimize the solution for larger inputs, ensuring the problem is solved within time limits.
Solution
Solution 1: Greedy + Recording Jump Positions
We define an array $\textit{nxt}$ of length $n - 1$, where $\textit{nxt}[i]$ represents the next city that can be reached from city $i$. Initially, $\textit{nxt}[i] = i + 1$.
class Solution:
def shortestDistanceAfterQueries(
self, n: int, queries: List[List[int]]
) -> List[int]:
nxt = list(range(1, n))
ans = []
cnt = n - 1
for u, v in queries:
if 0 < nxt[u] < v:
i = nxt[u]
while i < v:
cnt -= 1
nxt[i], i = 0, nxt[i]
nxt[u] = v
ans.append(cnt)
return ansContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Greedy choice plus invariant validation
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward