LeetCode Problem Workspace
Rearrange K Substrings to Form Target String
Determine if s can be split into k equal substrings and rearranged to match t using a hash table for frequency tracking.
3
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Hash Table plus String
Answer-first summary
Determine if s can be split into k equal substrings and rearranged to match t using a hash table for frequency tracking.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Hash Table plus String
Start by splitting s into k equal-sized substrings and counting the frequency of each substring. Then attempt to match these substrings with t using a hash map to track how each substring can be rearranged. This method quickly identifies whether a valid rearrangement exists without unnecessary sorting or permutation checks.
Problem Statement
You are given two strings s and t of the same length, and an integer k. Both strings are guaranteed to be anagrams of each other. Your goal is to determine if s can be divided into k equal-length substrings, and those substrings can be rearranged to form t.
Return true if it is possible to reorder the k substrings of s to exactly match t. Otherwise, return false. The solution requires careful handling of substring frequency and order, leveraging hash tables to ensure accuracy and efficiency.
Examples
Example 1
Input: s = "abcd", t = "cdab", k = 2
Output: true
Example 2
Input: s = "aabbcc", t = "bbaacc", k = 3
Output: true
Example 3
Input: s = "aabbcc", t = "bbaacc", k = 2
Output: false
Constraints
- 1 <= s.length == t.length <= 2 * 105
- 1 <= k <= s.length
- s.length is divisible by k.
- s and t consist only of lowercase English letters.
- The input is generated such that s and t are anagrams of each other.
Solution Approach
Split s and t into substrings
Divide s into k equal-length substrings and similarly partition t conceptually. Each substring from s must match a segment in t after rearrangement. Use a consistent length calculation to avoid off-by-one errors.
Use hash maps to count frequencies
Create a hash map for the substrings of s counting how many times each occurs. Then iterate over the corresponding substrings in t to check if the frequency map allows forming t. This avoids full permutation generation.
Validate rearrangement possibility
Check if each substring in t exists in the s frequency map and decrement counts as used. If all substrings can be matched, return true. Otherwise, return false, ensuring you catch any imbalance early for efficiency.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity depends on the substring splitting and frequency map operations, roughly O(n) where n is the length of s. Space complexity is O(k) for storing substring counts in the hash map, assuming substring length is constant relative to n.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Emphasize handling exact k substring partitions and potential off-by-one errors.
- Expect discussion of hash table usage to track substring frequencies efficiently.
- Be prepared to explain why naive permutation checks would be inefficient for larger n.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting to check that s.length is divisible by k, causing incorrect substring sizes.
- Using a simple sort of substrings without counting frequencies can miss valid rearrangements.
- Failing to decrement the hash map counts properly leads to false positives when matching t.
Follow-up variants
- Allowing k to be variable instead of fixed, requiring dynamic substring partitioning.
- Checking if rearrangement is possible with substrings of unequal length, increasing complexity.
- Extending to multi-character alphabets or Unicode strings, affecting hash map size and performance.
FAQ
What is the best approach to solve Rearrange K Substrings to Form Target String?
Split s into k equal substrings and use a hash map to track substring frequencies, then verify t can be formed using these counts.
Can this problem be solved without hash tables?
Technically yes, by generating all permutations, but it is highly inefficient; hash tables optimize frequency checking.
What should I watch out for with k and substring lengths?
Ensure s.length is divisible by k, and handle exact substring boundaries to avoid off-by-one errors.
Is sorting substrings enough to verify rearrangement?
No, sorting alone does not account for multiple identical substrings; frequency maps are required.
How does the Hash Table plus String pattern apply here?
It tracks how many times each substring occurs and ensures t can be built using these counts without unnecessary permutations.
Solution
Solution 1: Hash Table
Let the length of the string $s$ be $n$, then the length of each substring is $m = n / k$.
class Solution:
def isPossibleToRearrange(self, s: str, t: str, k: int) -> bool:
cnt = Counter()
n = len(s)
m = n // k
for i in range(0, n, m):
cnt[s[i : i + m]] += 1
cnt[t[i : i + m]] -= 1
return all(v == 0 for v in cnt.values())Continue Topic
hash table
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Hash Table plus String
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward