LeetCode Problem Workspace
Palindrome Partitioning III
Find the minimal character changes to split a string into k palindromes using precise dynamic programming state transitions.
2
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Find the minimal character changes to split a string into k palindromes using precise dynamic programming state transitions.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
To solve Palindrome Partitioning III, first precompute the cost to make each substring a palindrome. Then apply a dynamic programming state transition where dp[i][j] represents the minimal changes to split the first i characters into j palindromes. This approach ensures all overlapping subproblems are efficiently handled and avoids recomputation, producing the correct minimal change count for any string and partition count.
Problem Statement
Given a string s of lowercase letters and an integer k, divide s into k non-empty substrings such that each substring is a palindrome and the total number of character changes is minimized. Return the minimum number of changes required to achieve this partitioning.
For example, if s = "abc" and k = 2, you can split into "ab" and "c". Changing 1 character in "ab" to form a palindrome yields the minimal number of changes. Constraints include 1 <= k <= s.length <= 100 and s consists only of lowercase English letters.
Examples
Example 1
Input: s = "abc", k = 2
Output: 1
You can split the string into "ab" and "c", and change 1 character in "ab" to make it palindrome.
Example 2
Input: s = "aabbc", k = 3
Output: 0
You can split the string into "aa", "bb" and "c", all of them are palindrome.
Example 3
Input: s = "leetcode", k = 8
Output: 0
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= k <= s.length <= 100.
- s only contains lowercase English letters.
Solution Approach
Precompute Palindrome Costs
Compute a 2D table where cost[i][j] is the minimal number of character changes to turn substring s[i..j] into a palindrome. Use two pointers expanding from ends to center to count mismatches efficiently.
Dynamic Programming State Definition
Define dp[i][j] as the minimal changes to split the first i characters into j palindromes. Initialize dp[0][0] = 0 and all others to infinity. Iterate over substrings, updating dp[i][j] using previously computed dp values and precomputed costs.
State Transition and Result
For each dp[i][j], iterate k <= i and update dp[i][j] = min(dp[p][j-1] + cost[p][i-1]) for all valid p. After filling the DP table, dp[n][k] gives the minimal number of changes to partition s into k palindromes.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n^2 * k) due to iterating over all substrings for each partition count, and space complexity is O(n^2 + n*k) for storing palindrome costs and DP states.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Check if candidate precomputes substring palindrome costs efficiently.
- Look for correct DP state definition and transition logic.
- Verify handling of edge cases where k equals string length or 1.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting to precompute palindrome costs leading to TLE.
- Incorrect DP initialization causing invalid minimal values.
- Overlooking edge cases such as single-character substrings or k equal to string length.
Follow-up variants
- Minimizing changes to form exactly k palindromic substrings with additional character constraints.
- Allowing deletions instead of changes to form k palindromes.
- Extending the problem to partition into palindromes with maximum length constraints.
FAQ
What is the best approach for Palindrome Partitioning III?
Use precomputed palindrome costs and a DP table where dp[i][j] stores minimal changes for first i characters into j palindromes.
How do I handle single-character substrings in this problem?
Single-character substrings are already palindromes, so their cost is zero, simplifying the DP transitions.
Why precompute palindrome costs?
Precomputing avoids recalculating changes for the same substring multiple times, reducing overall complexity.
What is the time complexity of this DP solution?
Time complexity is O(n^2 * k) due to iterating over all substrings for each partition count.
Can this approach handle k equal to the string length?
Yes, each character forms its own palindrome, resulting in zero changes, which the DP table correctly captures.
Solution
Solution 1: Dynamic Programming
We define $f[i][j]$ to represent the minimum number of changes needed to partition the first $i$ characters of the string $s$ into $j$ palindromic substrings. We assume the index $i$ starts from 1, and the answer is $f[n][k]$.
class Solution:
def palindromePartition(self, s: str, k: int) -> int:
n = len(s)
g = [[0] * n for _ in range(n)]
for i in range(n - 1, -1, -1):
for j in range(i + 1, n):
g[i][j] = int(s[i] != s[j])
if i + 1 < j:
g[i][j] += g[i + 1][j - 1]
f = [[0] * (k + 1) for _ in range(n + 1)]
for i in range(1, n + 1):
for j in range(1, min(i, k) + 1):
if j == 1:
f[i][j] = g[0][i - 1]
else:
f[i][j] = inf
for h in range(j - 1, i):
f[i][j] = min(f[i][j], f[h][j - 1] + g[h][i - 1])
return f[n][k]Continue Topic
string
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward