LeetCode Problem Workspace
Number of Subarrays That Match a Pattern II
Count subarrays matching a pattern of relative values using array transformation and rolling hash techniques.
4
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · Array plus Rolling Hash
Answer-first summary
Count subarrays matching a pattern of relative values using array transformation and rolling hash techniques.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array plus Rolling Hash
This problem asks you to find how many subarrays of a given array match a specific pattern of relative values. By transforming the array into a new one based on comparison conditions, you can apply rolling hash techniques for efficient checking of matching subarrays.
Problem Statement
You are given an array nums and a pattern consisting of -1, 0, and 1. You need to determine the number of subarrays in nums that match this pattern. A subarray matches the pattern if the relative comparisons between consecutive elements in nums follow the conditions described by the elements of the pattern.
For instance, if the pattern is [1, 0, -1], the first comparison in the subarray should be less than the second element, the second element should be equal to the third element, and the third element should be greater than the fourth. The task is to count how many subarrays of size m + 1 in nums follow the exact pattern.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,5,6], pattern = [1,1]
Output: 4
The pattern [1,1] indicates that we are looking for strictly increasing subarrays of size 3. In the array nums, the subarrays [1,2,3], [2,3,4], [3,4,5], and [4,5,6] match this pattern. Hence, there are 4 subarrays in nums that match the pattern.
Example 2
Input: nums = [1,4,4,1,3,5,5,3], pattern = [1,0,-1]
Output: 2
Here, the pattern [1,0,-1] indicates that we are looking for a sequence where the first number is smaller than the second, the second is equal to the third, and the third is greater than the fourth. In the array nums, the subarrays [1,4,4,1], and [3,5,5,3] match this pattern. Hence, there are 2 subarrays in nums that match the pattern.
Constraints
- 2 <= n == nums.length <= 106
- 1 <= nums[i] <= 109
- 1 <= m == pattern.length < n
- -1 <= pattern[i] <= 1
Solution Approach
Array Transformation
Transform the array nums into a new array nums2 where each element represents the relative comparison between consecutive elements in nums. Specifically, nums2[i] = 1 if nums[i+1] > nums[i], nums2[i] = 0 if nums[i+1] == nums[i], and nums2[i] = -1 if nums[i+1] < nums[i]. This transformation makes it easier to match subarrays to the pattern.
Rolling Hash Approach
Using the transformed array nums2, apply a rolling hash technique to efficiently compare subarrays. Instead of checking each subarray individually, use a hash value to represent subarrays and quickly compare them to the pattern. This method reduces time complexity for large arrays.
Pattern Matching
With the transformed array and rolling hash, check each subarray of length m + 1 to see if it matches the given pattern. For a match, the relative values in nums2 should correspond exactly to the elements in the pattern.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity depends on the specific approach used. If using the array transformation and rolling hash techniques, the complexity is O(n), where n is the length of nums. This is much more efficient than a brute-force solution. The space complexity is O(n) due to the transformation array and hash storage.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Tests the candidate's ability to transform arrays efficiently.
- Assesses understanding of rolling hash techniques for optimization.
- Evaluates pattern matching skills and their application to subarrays.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Incorrectly transforming the array
numsintonums2based on relative comparisons. - Failure to optimize the solution with rolling hash, resulting in time complexity that is too high.
- Not accounting for edge cases, such as when
numshas the smallest or largest possible length.
Follow-up variants
- Using sliding window techniques instead of rolling hash for comparison.
- Allowing for additional constraints in the pattern, such as different values for matching conditions.
- Changing the input array structure, for example, making
numsa list of strings instead of integers.
FAQ
What is the best approach to solve 'Number of Subarrays That Match a Pattern II'?
The best approach is to transform the array into a new one that represents relative comparisons between consecutive elements and then use a rolling hash for efficient pattern matching.
How can rolling hash help in solving this problem?
Rolling hash helps by reducing the need to compare each subarray element by element. Instead, it computes a hash for each subarray, allowing for quick comparisons.
What is the complexity of the solution?
The time complexity is O(n) and space complexity is O(n), where n is the length of the input array nums.
Can this problem be solved without using rolling hash?
Yes, but using a rolling hash significantly optimizes the solution, especially for large arrays, making it much more efficient than a brute force approach.
What should I do if I encounter edge cases in 'Number of Subarrays That Match a Pattern II'?
Ensure that the edge cases, such as small array sizes and various pattern values, are handled correctly in both the array transformation and pattern matching steps.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
def partial(s):
g, pi = 0, [0] * len(s)
for i in range(1, len(s)):
while g and (s[g] != s[i]):
g = pi[g - 1]
pi[i] = g = g + (s[g] == s[i])
return pi
def match(s, pat):
pi = partial(pat)
g, idx = 0, []
for i in range(len(s)):
while g and pat[g] != s[i]:
g = pi[g - 1]
g += pat[g] == s[i]
if g == len(pi):
idx.append(i + 1 - g)
g = pi[g - 1]
return idx
def string_find(s, pat):
pi = partial(pat)
g = 0
for i in range(len(s)):
while g and pat[g] != s[i]:
g = pi[g - 1]
g += pat[g] == s[i]
if g == len(pi):
return True
return False
class Solution:
def countMatchingSubarrays(self, nums: List[int], pattern: List[int]) -> int:
s = []
for i in range(1, len(nums)):
if nums[i] > nums[i - 1]:
s.append(1)
elif nums[i] == nums[i - 1]:
s.append(0)
else:
s.append(-1)
return len(match(s, pattern))Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array plus Rolling Hash
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward