LeetCode Problem Workspace
Minimum White Tiles After Covering With Carpets
Find the minimum number of white tiles visible after optimally placing carpets using state transition dynamic programming.
3
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Find the minimum number of white tiles visible after optimally placing carpets using state transition dynamic programming.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
This problem requires calculating the fewest white tiles left after using a limited number of carpets. A state transition dynamic programming approach tracks the minimum visible white tiles for each floor position with remaining carpets. Using prefix sums can speed up computing white tiles in ranges, ensuring correct decisions when carpets can overlap or be placed consecutively.
Problem Statement
You are given a binary string representing a floor, where '1' indicates a white tile and '0' indicates a black tile. You have a set number of black carpets, each covering a fixed length of tiles.
Your task is to place all carpets optimally, possibly overlapping, so that the number of visible white tiles is minimized. Return the minimum count of white tiles left uncovered.
Examples
Example 1
Input: floor = "10110101", numCarpets = 2, carpetLen = 2
Output: 2
The figure above shows one way of covering the tiles with the carpets such that only 2 white tiles are visible. No other way of covering the tiles with the carpets can leave less than 2 white tiles visible.
Example 2
Input: floor = "11111", numCarpets = 2, carpetLen = 3
Output: 0
The figure above shows one way of covering the tiles with the carpets such that no white tiles are visible. Note that the carpets are able to overlap one another.
Constraints
- 1 <= carpetLen <= floor.length <= 1000
- floor[i] is either '0' or '1'.
- 1 <= numCarpets <= 1000
Solution Approach
Dynamic Programming State Definition
Define dp[i][k] as the minimum number of white tiles visible starting from index i with k carpets left. Transition considers either skipping the current tile or placing a carpet of length carpetLen starting at i.
Prefix Sum Optimization
Precompute prefix sums of white tiles to quickly calculate the number of white tiles a carpet would cover. This avoids recalculating sums repeatedly during state transitions and keeps the DP efficient.
Iterative or Recursive Computation
Fill dp either recursively with memoization or iteratively from the end of the floor to the start. Each step chooses the option that leaves the fewest white tiles visible, handling overlaps naturally by state transitions.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n numCarpets) where n is the length of floor, since each DP state depends on remaining carpets. Space can be O(n numCarpets) for full DP table, or optimized to O(n) per carpet iteration using rolling arrays. Prefix sum computation adds O(n) time and space but improves efficiency for range calculations.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Look for correct DP state definition and transitions.
- Check handling of overlapping carpets and full coverage scenarios.
- Ask if prefix sums can optimize repeated white tile counting.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting carpets can overlap, leading to incorrect minimum counts.
- Not handling edge cases where carpetLen exceeds remaining floor length.
- Incorrectly updating DP states when skipping tiles versus placing a carpet.
Follow-up variants
- Change to minimize black tiles visible instead of white tiles.
- Allow carpets of varying lengths instead of a fixed carpetLen.
- Provide multiple floors and require independent minimization for each.
FAQ
What is the main pattern used in Minimum White Tiles After Covering With Carpets?
State transition dynamic programming tracks minimal visible white tiles for each index with remaining carpets.
Can carpets overlap in this problem?
Yes, carpets may overlap, and the DP must account for overlapping ranges correctly.
How do prefix sums help in this problem?
Prefix sums allow fast computation of white tiles covered by a carpet, reducing redundant calculations.
What is the time complexity of this solution?
The time complexity is O(n*numCarpets), where n is the length of the floor string.
Can we optimize space usage in the DP approach?
Yes, by using rolling arrays, space can be reduced to O(n) per carpet iteration instead of O(n*numCarpets).
Solution
Solution 1: Memoization Search
We design a function $\textit{dfs}(i, j)$ to represent the minimum number of white tiles that are not covered starting from index $i$ using $j$ carpets. The answer is $\textit{dfs}(0, \textit{numCarpets})$.
class Solution:
def minimumWhiteTiles(self, floor: str, numCarpets: int, carpetLen: int) -> int:
@cache
def dfs(i: int, j: int) -> int:
if i >= n:
return 0
if floor[i] == "0":
return dfs(i + 1, j)
if j == 0:
return s[-1] - s[i]
return min(1 + dfs(i + 1, j), dfs(i + carpetLen, j - 1))
n = len(floor)
s = [0] * (n + 1)
for i, c in enumerate(floor):
s[i + 1] = s[i] + int(c == "1")
ans = dfs(0, numCarpets)
dfs.cache_clear()
return ansContinue Topic
string
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward