LeetCode Problem Workspace
Distinct Subsequences II
Find the number of distinct non-empty subsequences of a string using dynamic programming and state transitions.
2
Topics
7
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Find the number of distinct non-empty subsequences of a string using dynamic programming and state transitions.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
Distinct Subsequences II involves calculating the number of unique subsequences in a string. Using dynamic programming and state transitions, this problem requires managing previous results and optimizing for large inputs. The final answer is returned modulo 10^9 + 7 due to large possible outputs.
Problem Statement
Given a string s, return the number of distinct non-empty subsequences of s. A subsequence is a sequence that can be derived by deleting some or no characters without changing the order of the remaining characters. Since the answer may be very large, return it modulo 10^9 + 7.
For example, for the string abc, the subsequences include: "a", "b", "c", "ab", "ac", "bc", and "abc". The problem can be solved using dynamic programming by managing the state transitions that track subsequences. The approach ensures that all subsequences are counted efficiently.
Examples
Example 1
Input: s = "abc"
Output: 7
The 7 distinct subsequences are "a", "b", "c", "ab", "ac", "bc", and "abc".
Example 2
Input: s = "aba"
Output: 6
The 6 distinct subsequences are "a", "b", "ab", "aa", "ba", and "aba".
Example 3
Input: s = "aaa"
Output: 3
The 3 distinct subsequences are "a", "aa" and "aaa".
Constraints
- 1 <= s.length <= 2000
- s consists of lowercase English letters.
Solution Approach
Dynamic Programming State Transitions
This problem uses dynamic programming to track the number of distinct subsequences at each step. The main idea is to keep track of previously computed subsequences and their counts, adjusting the results based on the current character and previous subsequences. This approach reduces redundant computations.
Handling Large Results with Modulo Operation
Since the number of distinct subsequences can be very large, the answer is returned modulo 10^9 + 7 to avoid overflow. This ensures the solution remains efficient and feasible even with larger strings.
Optimized Space Complexity
The space complexity is reduced to O(N) by only keeping track of the current and previous states of subsequences, eliminating the need for a 2D table. This optimization allows the solution to handle large strings more efficiently.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(N) |
| Space | O(N) |
The time complexity is O(N) since the solution iterates through the string once, updating the state at each step. The space complexity is O(N) due to the space used for storing intermediate results for each character in the string.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Candidate demonstrates understanding of dynamic programming with state transitions.
- Candidate efficiently handles modulo operation and optimizes for large outputs.
- Candidate is able to reduce space complexity while maintaining the correctness of the solution.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Mismanaging state transitions or failing to correctly account for previously seen characters.
- Overcomplicating the problem by using unnecessary extra space for subsequences.
- Failing to apply the modulo operation correctly and causing overflow.
Follow-up variants
- Consider an extension where the string contains multiple distinct characters and the subsequences are constrained by specific conditions.
- A variant where the input string is limited to a smaller set of characters, altering the number of possible subsequences.
- Another variant could involve counting subsequences that follow specific patterns or orderings within the string.
FAQ
How do I approach the Distinct Subsequences II problem?
Start by recognizing that this problem requires dynamic programming and state transitions to track subsequences. Handle large outputs with modulo operations.
What is the time complexity of the solution?
The time complexity is O(N), where N is the length of the string.
How do I optimize space for this problem?
You can optimize space by storing only the current and previous states of subsequences, reducing the space complexity to O(N).
What is the significance of modulo 10^9 + 7 in this problem?
The modulo operation ensures that the number of subsequences doesn't overflow the standard integer range, keeping the result manageable.
How does the state transition work in this problem?
At each character, the number of subsequences is updated based on the previous state, adjusting for any duplicates caused by repeating characters.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
class Solution:
def distinctSubseqII(self, s: str) -> int:
mod = 10**9 + 7
n = len(s)
dp = [[0] * 26 for _ in range(n + 1)]
for i, c in enumerate(s, 1):
k = ord(c) - ord('a')
for j in range(26):
if j == k:
dp[i][j] = sum(dp[i - 1]) % mod + 1
else:
dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j]
return sum(dp[-1]) % modSolution 2
#### Python3
class Solution:
def distinctSubseqII(self, s: str) -> int:
mod = 10**9 + 7
n = len(s)
dp = [[0] * 26 for _ in range(n + 1)]
for i, c in enumerate(s, 1):
k = ord(c) - ord('a')
for j in range(26):
if j == k:
dp[i][j] = sum(dp[i - 1]) % mod + 1
else:
dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j]
return sum(dp[-1]) % modSolution 3
#### Python3
class Solution:
def distinctSubseqII(self, s: str) -> int:
mod = 10**9 + 7
n = len(s)
dp = [[0] * 26 for _ in range(n + 1)]
for i, c in enumerate(s, 1):
k = ord(c) - ord('a')
for j in range(26):
if j == k:
dp[i][j] = sum(dp[i - 1]) % mod + 1
else:
dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j]
return sum(dp[-1]) % modContinue Topic
string
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward