LeetCode Problem Workspace
Destroy Sequential Targets
Find the minimum seed value to destroy the most targets on a number line, using array scanning and hash lookup.
3
Topics
4
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Array scanning plus hash lookup
Answer-first summary
Find the minimum seed value to destroy the most targets on a number line, using array scanning and hash lookup.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array scanning plus hash lookup
To solve this problem, we need to find the best seed to destroy the maximum number of targets. By using array scanning combined with hash lookups, we track the maximum destruction count for each potential seed. The solution requires carefully tracking targets that can be destroyed sequentially, starting from the chosen seed and using the given space.
Problem Statement
You are given an array nums, where each element represents a target on a number line. Along with this array, you're provided an integer space. A machine can be seeded with an element nums[i], and it will destroy all targets with values in the form nums[i] + c * space, where c is a non-negative integer. The goal is to find the minimum value from nums[i] that can destroy the maximum number of targets.
Your task is to return the smallest number from nums that can be seeded to destroy the maximum number of targets. If multiple numbers can destroy the same maximum number of targets, return the smallest one.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [3,7,8,1,1,5], space = 2
Output: 1
If we seed the machine with nums[3], then we destroy all targets equal to 1,3,5,7,9,... In this case, we would destroy 5 total targets (all except for nums[2]). It is impossible to destroy more than 5 targets, so we return nums[3].
Example 2
Input: nums = [1,3,5,2,4,6], space = 2
Output: 1
Seeding the machine with nums[0], or nums[3] destroys 3 targets. It is not possible to destroy more than 3 targets. Since nums[0] is the minimal integer that can destroy 3 targets, we return 1.
Example 3
Input: nums = [6,2,5], space = 100
Output: 2
Whatever initial seed we select, we can only destroy 1 target. The minimal seed is nums[1].
Constraints
- 1 <= nums.length <= 105
- 1 <= nums[i] <= 109
- 1 <= space <= 109
Solution Approach
Hashmap-based counting
We can iterate over the array and use a hashmap to count how many targets can be destroyed for each possible seed. For each nums[i], the machine can destroy all targets equal to nums[i] + c * space. By maintaining a count of destroyed targets for each seed, we can efficiently find the one that destroys the most targets.
Modulo tracking
Another effective approach is to track the remainder when each number in nums is divided by space. This allows us to group the numbers by their potential destruction sequence. By storing the count of targets destroyed by each modulo group, we can quickly identify the seed that destroys the most targets.
Efficient array traversal
By combining array scanning with the above hashmap or modulo tracking method, we can traverse the array and perform efficient lookups to keep track of the destruction count. This avoids unnecessary comparisons and minimizes the time complexity.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity depends on the approach, but using a hashmap or modulo tracking reduces the need for brute-force comparisons, making it much more efficient than checking all possible pairs. Space complexity is also impacted by the need to store counts for each number and its modulo class, which may require O(n) space in the worst case.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Looks for knowledge of hashmaps and modulo operations.
- Tests the ability to implement efficient algorithms without brute force.
- Assesses problem-solving skills in optimizing performance with large input sizes.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Confusing the seed with the number of destroyed targets, leading to incorrect output.
- Failing to track numbers modulo space, resulting in inefficient solutions.
- Not handling large input sizes efficiently, causing timeouts.
Follow-up variants
- What if targets are ordered? Does it change the approach?
- What happens if all numbers are the same?
- Can you optimize further by using binary search on sorted nums?
FAQ
What pattern should I focus on for Destroy Sequential Targets?
The core pattern is array scanning combined with hash lookup or modulo operations to track which seed destroys the most targets.
How do I handle large arrays in this problem?
Using a hashmap or modulo approach ensures you don't need to compare every element to every other element, making the solution more scalable.
Why is modulo important in this problem?
Modulo helps group numbers that can be destroyed by the same seed, allowing you to track destruction sequences more efficiently.
What is the expected time complexity of this problem?
The time complexity depends on the approach you use, but it can be reduced to O(n) using a hashmap or modulo tracking.
What should I do if multiple numbers destroy the same number of targets?
Return the smallest number among them, as specified in the problem statement.
Solution
Solution 1: Modulo + Enumeration
We traverse the array $nums$ and use a hash table $cnt$ to count the frequency of each number modulo $space$. The higher the frequency, the more targets can be destroyed. We find the group with the highest frequency and take the minimum value in the group.
class Solution:
def destroyTargets(self, nums: List[int], space: int) -> int:
cnt = Counter(v % space for v in nums)
ans = mx = 0
for v in nums:
t = cnt[v % space]
if t > mx or (t == mx and v < ans):
ans = v
mx = t
return ansContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array scanning plus hash lookup
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward