LeetCode Problem Workspace
Construct the Lexicographically Largest Valid Sequence
Construct the Lexicographically Largest Valid Sequence problem involves finding the largest sequence with backtracking and pruning.
2
Topics
4
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Backtracking search with pruning
Answer-first summary
Construct the Lexicographically Largest Valid Sequence problem involves finding the largest sequence with backtracking and pruning.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Backtracking search with pruning
This problem requires constructing a lexicographically largest valid sequence for a given n. The solution employs backtracking with pruning to find a sequence that satisfies the absolute distance condition between numbers. The challenge is to efficiently explore possibilities and ensure the largest valid sequence is returned.
Problem Statement
You are given an integer n. Your task is to construct a sequence consisting of elements in the range [1, n] that satisfies the following condition: the absolute difference between two numbers at positions i and j, |j - i|, equals the distance between those numbers. The sequence must be valid under this condition.
Your goal is to return the lexicographically largest sequence that satisfies this constraint. It is guaranteed that a solution always exists for the given constraints, where 1 <= n <= 20.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 3
Output: [3,1,2,3,2]
[2,3,2,1,3] is also a valid sequence, but [3,1,2,3,2] is the lexicographically largest valid sequence.
Example 2
Input: n = 5
Output: [5,3,1,4,3,5,2,4,2]
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= n <= 20
Solution Approach
Backtracking with pruning
The solution uses backtracking to explore all possible sequences and checks for validity based on the distance condition. Pruning is applied to eliminate invalid sequences early, improving efficiency.
Lexicographical order optimization
During the backtracking process, sequences are constructed in a way that prioritizes larger values first, ensuring the lexicographically largest sequence is found.
Recursive exploration of sequence positions
The recursive function explores each position in the sequence, trying different values from 1 to n and backtracking when a valid sequence is not achievable, ensuring all possibilities are explored.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n!) |
| Space | O(n) |
The time complexity of this solution is O(n!) due to the backtracking nature, where each step explores n possibilities. The space complexity is O(n), as the recursion stack stores the current state of the sequence being built.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Candidate demonstrates understanding of backtracking algorithms and pruning techniques.
- Candidate is able to optimize the search space by prioritizing lexicographical order.
- Candidate can handle recursive exploration with attention to efficiency.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not pruning invalid sequences early enough, leading to excessive computation.
- Failing to optimize the sequence construction for lexicographical order, which may result in incorrect or suboptimal solutions.
- Overcomplicating the backtracking process without utilizing pruning to reduce the search space.
Follow-up variants
- Use of a heuristic algorithm to improve efficiency when n is large.
- Modification to generate the smallest valid lexicographical sequence.
- Exploring dynamic programming or memoization for optimizing repeated subproblems in backtracking.
FAQ
What is the main challenge in constructing the lexicographically largest valid sequence?
The main challenge lies in efficiently exploring the sequence space with backtracking and ensuring the lexicographically largest sequence is selected.
How does pruning improve the backtracking process in this problem?
Pruning eliminates invalid sequences early, reducing the number of paths the backtracking algorithm needs to explore, making the solution more efficient.
How can heuristic algorithms help with this problem?
Heuristic algorithms can help prioritize certain branches in the backtracking process, leading to quicker identification of valid sequences, improving overall efficiency.
What is the time complexity of the solution?
The time complexity is O(n!) due to the backtracking nature of the solution, as each recursive call explores n possibilities.
Can dynamic programming be used to optimize the solution?
While dynamic programming is not traditionally used for this type of problem, it may be useful for optimizing certain repeated subproblems within the backtracking approach.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
class Solution:
def constructDistancedSequence(self, n: int) -> List[int]:
def dfs(u):
if u == n * 2:
return True
if path[u]:
return dfs(u + 1)
for i in range(n, 1, -1):
if cnt[i] and u + i < n * 2 and path[u + i] == 0:
cnt[i] = 0
path[u] = path[u + i] = i
if dfs(u + 1):
return True
path[u] = path[u + i] = 0
cnt[i] = 2
if cnt[1]:
cnt[1], path[u] = 0, 1
if dfs(u + 1):
return True
path[u], cnt[1] = 0, 1
return False
path = [0] * (n * 2)
cnt = [2] * (n * 2)
cnt[1] = 1
dfs(1)
return path[1:]Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Backtracking search with pruning
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward