LeetCode Problem Workspace
Closest Dessert Cost
Find the closest dessert cost to a target by selecting from a list of base flavors and topping combinations using dynamic programming.
3
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Find the closest dessert cost to a target by selecting from a list of base flavors and topping combinations using dynamic programming.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
The closest dessert cost problem involves selecting a base and topping combination to get as close to a target cost as possible. Dynamic programming, especially state transition techniques, can help efficiently explore all combinations to determine the closest match. Brute force is also an option due to manageable constraints.
Problem Statement
You are tasked with making a dessert using a variety of ice cream base flavors and topping choices. You are given a list of baseCosts representing the prices of the base flavors and toppingCosts representing the price per topping. You must select one base flavor and zero or more toppings, such that the total cost is as close as possible to a given target.
The goal is to return the total cost of the dessert that is closest to the target. If multiple desserts are equidistant from the target, return the one with the lowest cost. You can use dynamic programming or brute force enumeration due to the problem’s manageable constraints.
Examples
Example 1
Input: baseCosts = [1,7], toppingCosts = [3,4], target = 10
Output: 10
Consider the following combination (all 0-indexed):
- Choose base 1: cost 7
- Take 1 of topping 0: cost 1 x 3 = 3
- Take 0 of topping 1: cost 0 x 4 = 0 Total: 7 + 3 + 0 = 10.
Example 2
Input: baseCosts = [2,3], toppingCosts = [4,5,100], target = 18
Output: 17
Consider the following combination (all 0-indexed):
- Choose base 1: cost 3
- Take 1 of topping 0: cost 1 x 4 = 4
- Take 2 of topping 1: cost 2 x 5 = 10
- Take 0 of topping 2: cost 0 x 100 = 0 Total: 3 + 4 + 10 + 0 = 17. You cannot make a dessert with a total cost of 18.
Example 3
Input: baseCosts = [3,10], toppingCosts = [2,5], target = 9
Output: 8
It is possible to make desserts with cost 8 and 10. Return 8 as it is the lower cost.
Constraints
- n == baseCosts.length
- m == toppingCosts.length
- 1 <= n, m <= 10
- 1 <= baseCosts[i], toppingCosts[i] <= 104
- 1 <= target <= 104
Solution Approach
State Transition Dynamic Programming
Dynamic programming can be used to explore all possible base and topping combinations. By treating the problem as a state transition, we can track all possible costs and select the one that is closest to the target. This approach avoids redundant calculations and helps optimize the solution.
Brute Force Enumeration
Given the manageable constraints, you can also use brute force to enumerate all possible combinations of base flavors and toppings. This method simply checks every combination and computes the total cost to find the closest match to the target.
Backtracking Optimization
Backtracking can be useful for pruning unnecessary branches in the search space. As we iterate over the topping options, we can stop early if the cost exceeds the target, reducing computation time.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity of this problem depends on the approach. Brute force would have a time complexity of O(n * 3^m) where n is the number of base costs and m is the number of toppings. State transition dynamic programming can be more efficient, but it requires tracking all possible costs and is influenced by both the base costs and topping combinations.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Assess the candidate’s ability to identify the right problem-solving pattern for state transitions and dynamic programming.
- Evaluate whether they can efficiently manage the search space using dynamic programming or brute force.
- Look for understanding of backtracking as a technique to optimize the search for solutions.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not properly handling the combination of base costs and toppings, leading to inefficient or incorrect solutions.
- Misunderstanding the problem’s constraints, resulting in an overcomplicated approach when brute force would suffice.
- Failing to optimize by pruning unnecessary branches during backtracking, leading to excessive computation.
Follow-up variants
- Increase the number of base flavors or topping types, testing the scalability of the solution.
- Introduce a minimum cost constraint, where the total dessert cost must exceed a certain threshold.
- Expand the problem to allow for more complex dessert types with multiple layers or categories of toppings.
FAQ
How do I solve the Closest Dessert Cost problem using dynamic programming?
Dynamic programming allows you to track all possible costs for each combination of base and toppings, and select the one closest to the target.
Can brute force be used to solve the Closest Dessert Cost problem?
Yes, brute force is feasible due to the problem's constraints, allowing you to check all possible combinations of base and toppings.
What are the common pitfalls when solving the Closest Dessert Cost problem?
Some pitfalls include inefficient handling of combinations, overcomplicating the solution, and not optimizing the search space using backtracking.
How does backtracking help in the Closest Dessert Cost problem?
Backtracking helps by pruning unnecessary branches of the search, improving efficiency when exploring topping combinations.
What is the time complexity of solving the Closest Dessert Cost problem?
Time complexity depends on the approach: brute force has O(n * 3^m), while dynamic programming’s complexity varies based on how you track costs.
Solution
Solution 1
#### Python3
class Solution:
def closestCost(
self, baseCosts: List[int], toppingCosts: List[int], target: int
) -> int:
def dfs(i, t):
if i >= len(toppingCosts):
arr.append(t)
return
dfs(i + 1, t)
dfs(i + 1, t + toppingCosts[i])
arr = []
dfs(0, 0)
arr.sort()
d = ans = inf
# 选择一种冰激淋基料
for x in baseCosts:
# 枚举子集和
for y in arr:
# 二分查找
i = bisect_left(arr, target - x - y)
for j in (i, i - 1):
if 0 <= j < len(arr):
t = abs(x + y + arr[j] - target)
if d > t or (d == t and ans > x + y + arr[j]):
d = t
ans = x + y + arr[j]
return ansContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward