LeetCode Problem Workspace
Burst Balloons
Burst Balloons is a hard dynamic programming problem requiring careful state transitions to maximize coins collected efficiently.
2
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Hard · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Burst Balloons is a hard dynamic programming problem requiring careful state transitions to maximize coins collected efficiently.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
This problem demands a state transition dynamic programming approach where each decision impacts subsequent gains. By considering each balloon as the last to burst in a range, you can compute maximum coins recursively and store results for overlapping subproblems. Efficient memoization or DP tables are essential to avoid redundant calculations and ensure correct final output.
Problem Statement
You are given an array nums representing n balloons, each painted with a number. Your task is to burst all balloons one by one to maximize coins collected.
Bursting the ith balloon yields coins equal to nums[i - 1] * nums[i] * nums[i + 1], treating out-of-bound neighbors as 1. Return the maximum coins achievable by choosing the bursting order optimally.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [3,1,5,8]
Output: 167
nums = [3,1,5,8] --> [3,5,8] --> [3,8] --> [8] --> [] coins = 3 1 5 + 3 5 8 + 1 3 8 + 1 8 1 = 167
Example 2
Input: nums = [1,5]
Output: 10
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- n == nums.length
- 1 <= n <= 300
- 0 <= nums[i] <= 100
Solution Approach
Augment the array and define DP state
Insert 1 at the start and end of nums to simplify edge cases. Define dp[i][j] as the maximum coins obtainable by bursting all balloons between index i and j exclusively.
Recursive state transition
For each subarray (i,j), consider each balloon k as the last to burst. Update dp[i][j] = max(dp[i][j], dp[i][k] + nums[i]*nums[k]*nums[j] + dp[k][j]) to capture maximum coins from combining left, right, and last burst.
Iterative DP and memoization
Fill dp table iteratively by increasing subarray lengths or use memoized recursion. This ensures overlapping subproblems are solved once and total time remains manageable for n up to 300.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n^3) due to iterating all subarrays and possible last balloons within each. Space complexity is O(n^2) for the DP table storing maximum coins for all ranges.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Expect discussion of recursive state definition versus iterative DP filling.
- Look for correct handling of boundary conditions using virtual balloons of value 1.
- Check awareness of overlapping subproblems and use of memoization or DP table.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting to pad nums with 1 at both ends leading to index errors.
- Incorrectly defining DP state, such as including endpoints instead of exclusive ranges.
- Neglecting to iterate all possible last-burst positions within a subarray.
Follow-up variants
- Maximizing coins when balloons can have negative numbers, requiring careful multiplication handling.
- Bursting balloons with additional constraints, e.g., only adjacent balloons can be burst next.
- Adapting the DP approach to count number of distinct maximum-coin sequences.
FAQ
What is the key dynamic programming pattern in Burst Balloons?
The problem uses state transition DP where each balloon is considered as the last to burst in a subarray, allowing optimal coin calculation.
How do I handle edge balloons when calculating coins?
Treat out-of-bound neighbors as 1 by padding the array at both ends, simplifying calculations for first and last balloons.
Is recursion sufficient or should I use iterative DP?
Memoized recursion works, but iterative DP ensures all subarrays are processed systematically and avoids stack overflows for large n.
Why is time complexity O(n^3) for Burst Balloons?
Each of the O(n^2) subarrays requires iterating O(n) possible last-burst positions, giving total O(n^3) operations.
Can this DP approach handle arrays up to length 300 efficiently?
Yes, with proper memoization or DP table filling, O(n^3) operations are feasible for n up to 300 without exceeding time limits.
Solution
Solution 1: Dynamic Programming
Let's denote the length of the array `nums` as $n$. According to the problem description, we can add a $1$ to both ends of the array `nums`, denoted as `arr`.
class Solution:
def maxCoins(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
arr = [1] + nums + [1]
f = [[0] * (n + 2) for _ in range(n + 2)]
for i in range(n - 1, -1, -1):
for j in range(i + 2, n + 2):
for k in range(i + 1, j):
f[i][j] = max(f[i][j], f[i][k] + f[k][j] + arr[i] * arr[k] * arr[j])
return f[0][-1]Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Hard
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward