LeetCode Problem Workspace
XOR Queries of a Subarray
Compute XOR results for multiple subarray queries using efficient prefix XOR to reduce repeated computation overhead in arrays.
3
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Array plus Bit Manipulation
Answer-first summary
Compute XOR results for multiple subarray queries using efficient prefix XOR to reduce repeated computation overhead in arrays.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array plus Bit Manipulation
Start by building a prefix XOR array to store cumulative XORs up to each index. For each query, calculate the subarray XOR using the prefix array in constant time. This approach avoids recomputation for overlapping subarrays and ensures optimal performance for large arrays and numerous queries.
Problem Statement
Given an array of positive integers and a list of queries where each query specifies a range [left, right], compute the XOR of all elements within that range for each query. Return the results as an array corresponding to the queries in order.
Each query can cover any contiguous segment of the array, and the solution must efficiently handle large arrays and many queries by leveraging properties of XOR and prefix calculations to minimize repeated operations.
Examples
Example 1
Input: arr = [1,3,4,8], queries = [[0,1],[1,2],[0,3],[3,3]]
Output: [2,7,14,8]
The binary representation of the elements in the array are: 1 = 0001 3 = 0011 4 = 0100 8 = 1000 The XOR values for queries are: [0,1] = 1 xor 3 = 2 [1,2] = 3 xor 4 = 7 [0,3] = 1 xor 3 xor 4 xor 8 = 14 [3,3] = 8
Example 2
Input: arr = [4,8,2,10], queries = [[2,3],[1,3],[0,0],[0,3]]
Output: [8,0,4,4]
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= arr.length, queries.length <= 3 * 104
- 1 <= arr[i] <= 109
- queries[i].length == 2
- 0 <= lefti <= righti < arr.length
Solution Approach
Compute Prefix XOR Array
Build a prefix XOR array where prefix[i] stores the XOR of elements from arr[0] to arr[i-1]. This allows O(1) subarray XOR computation using the property x ^ x = 0 and prefix[right+1] ^ prefix[left].
Answer Queries in Constant Time
For each query [left, right], return prefix[right+1] ^ prefix[left]. This uses the prefix XOR array to directly compute the subarray XOR without iterating over elements, handling overlapping queries efficiently.
Handle Edge Cases and Constraints
Ensure the prefix array is initialized with 0 at index 0 to handle queries starting at index 0. Validate queries are within array bounds and leverage the property of XOR to avoid recomputation even for large arrays.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n + q) |
| Space | O(1) |
Time complexity is O(n + q), where n is array length and q is number of queries, because building the prefix array takes O(n) and each query is answered in O(1). Space complexity is O(n) for the prefix XOR array, but additional space for output is negligible.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Check if you recognize that XOR has an inverse property that allows prefix computations.
- They might ask for an optimization beyond naive O(n*q) subarray calculation.
- Expect a hint about building cumulative data structures, specifically prefix XOR, for constant-time queries.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Not initializing prefix array with zero leading to incorrect XOR for subarrays starting at index 0.
- Attempting to iterate over the subarray for each query, resulting in TLE for large inputs.
- Misunderstanding XOR properties, especially forgetting that x ^ x = 0 can simplify calculations.
Follow-up variants
- Compute XOR for dynamic ranges where elements are updated between queries.
- Use XOR queries on a 2D matrix instead of a 1D array, applying similar prefix ideas.
- Determine the maximum XOR among all subarray ranges instead of specific queries.
FAQ
What is the most efficient way to solve XOR Queries of a Subarray?
Use a prefix XOR array so each query is answered in constant time by computing prefix[right+1] ^ prefix[left].
Why use prefix XOR instead of iterating each subarray?
Iterating each subarray results in O(n*q) complexity which is too slow; prefix XOR reduces each query to O(1).
How does XOR property x ^ x = 0 help in this problem?
It allows the cancellation of overlapping elements in prefix XOR, enabling fast subarray computation without recomputation.
Can this approach handle large arrays and many queries?
Yes, because building the prefix array is O(n) and each query is O(1), making it scalable for arrays up to 3*10^4 elements.
Is there a variant for 2D arrays?
Yes, prefix XOR can be extended to 2D matrices, computing submatrix XOR using similar cancellation principles.
Solution
Solution 1: Prefix XOR
We can use a prefix XOR array $s$ of length $n+1$ to store the prefix XOR results of the array $\textit{arr}$, where $s[i] = s[i-1] \oplus \textit{arr}[i-1]$. That is, $s[i]$ represents the XOR result of the first $i$ elements of $\textit{arr}$.
class Solution:
def xorQueries(self, arr: List[int], queries: List[List[int]]) -> List[int]:
s = list(accumulate(arr, xor, initial=0))
return [s[r + 1] ^ s[l] for l, r in queries]Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array plus Bit Manipulation
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward