LeetCode Problem Workspace
Sum of Beauty in the Array
Calculate the sum of beauty for array elements using prefix and suffix tracking to optimize evaluation across indices efficiently.
1
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Array-driven solution strategy
Answer-first summary
Calculate the sum of beauty for array elements using prefix and suffix tracking to optimize evaluation across indices efficiently.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array-driven solution strategy
To solve Sum of Beauty in the Array, iterate through the array while maintaining prefix maximums and suffix minimums. Evaluate each element's beauty using defined conditions in O(n) time. This approach ensures all subarray comparisons are efficient and avoids redundant computations, making it ideal for large arrays.
Problem Statement
Given a 0-indexed integer array nums, compute the beauty of each element nums[i] for indices 1 to nums.length - 2. The beauty rules are: assign 2 if nums[i] is strictly greater than all previous elements and strictly smaller than all following elements, assign 1 if nums[i] is greater than the immediate previous element and smaller than the immediate next element, otherwise assign 0.
Return the total sum of beauty for all valid indices. For example, given nums = [1,2,3], the beauty of nums[1] is 2, so the output is 2. Constraints: 3 <= nums.length <= 105 and 1 <= nums[i] <= 105.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [1,2,3]
Output: 2
For each index i in the range 1 <= i <= 1:
- The beauty of nums[1] equals 2.
Example 2
Input: nums = [2,4,6,4]
Output: 1
For each index i in the range 1 <= i <= 2:
- The beauty of nums[1] equals 1.
- The beauty of nums[2] equals 0.
Example 3
Input: nums = [3,2,1]
Output: 0
For each index i in the range 1 <= i <= 1:
- The beauty of nums[1] equals 0.
Constraints
- 3 <= nums.length <= 105
- 1 <= nums[i] <= 105
Solution Approach
Prefix and Suffix Arrays
Compute a prefix maximum array and a suffix minimum array to quickly evaluate if nums[i] meets the strict beauty condition for 2 without scanning each subarray repeatedly.
Single Pass Evaluation
Iterate from index 1 to nums.length - 2 and check nums[i] against prefix maximum and suffix minimum for beauty 2, and simple adjacent comparisons for beauty 1, accumulating the total sum.
Optimization Considerations
Avoid recalculating max/min values by precomputing prefix/suffix arrays, ensuring O(n) time and O(n) space complexity, which scales efficiently for large arrays.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n) because each element is processed once with precomputed prefix and suffix arrays. Space complexity is O(n) due to storing the prefix maximums and suffix minimums for all elements.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Candidate tries nested loops instead of prefix/suffix optimization.
- Candidate misses strict versus adjacent comparison distinctions for beauty evaluation.
- Candidate overlooks edge indices, focusing only on middle array elements.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Using O(n^2) nested loops leading to timeout on large arrays.
- Confusing beauty 2 with beauty 1 conditions and miscounting.
- Failing to precompute prefix/suffix arrays, recalculating maxima/minima repeatedly.
Follow-up variants
- Compute sum of beauty for a sliding window within the array.
- Modify beauty rules to consider k previous and next elements instead of immediate neighbors.
- Calculate maximum possible total beauty for arrays with arbitrary integer ranges.
FAQ
What is the key strategy to solve Sum of Beauty in the Array efficiently?
Use prefix maximum and suffix minimum arrays to evaluate each element's beauty without redundant subarray scans.
Can I use nested loops to check beauty conditions?
Nested loops are inefficient for large arrays and may lead to timeouts; prefix/suffix arrays are recommended.
How do I handle the edge indices when calculating beauty?
Only indices from 1 to nums.length - 2 are valid; skip the first and last elements.
What is the difference between beauty 1 and beauty 2 in this array problem?
Beauty 2 requires strict global comparisons with all previous and following elements, while beauty 1 only requires adjacent element comparison.
Does GhostInterview help identify failure modes in array-driven solutions?
Yes, it highlights common mistakes such as miscounting beauty or missing prefix/suffix optimization opportunities.
Solution
Solution 1: Preprocessing Right Minimum + Traversing to Maintain Left Maximum
We can preprocess the right minimum array $right$, where $right[i]$ represents the minimum value in $nums[i..n-1]$.
class Solution:
def sumOfBeauties(self, nums: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(nums)
right = [nums[-1]] * n
for i in range(n - 2, -1, -1):
right[i] = min(right[i + 1], nums[i])
ans = 0
l = nums[0]
for i in range(1, n - 1):
r = right[i + 1]
if l < nums[i] < r:
ans += 2
elif nums[i - 1] < nums[i] < nums[i + 1]:
ans += 1
l = max(l, nums[i])
return ansContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array-driven solution strategy
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward