LeetCode Problem Workspace
Ones and Zeroes
Solve the Ones and Zeroes problem using dynamic programming with state transition, focusing on array and string manipulation.
3
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · State transition dynamic programming
Answer-first summary
Solve the Ones and Zeroes problem using dynamic programming with state transition, focusing on array and string manipulation.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for State transition dynamic programming
To solve the Ones and Zeroes problem, use dynamic programming to find the largest subset of binary strings with at most m 0's and n 1's. The problem relies on efficiently managing state transitions while ensuring the 0's and 1's constraints are met. This problem tests your ability to optimize with dynamic programming while dealing with array and string manipulation.
Problem Statement
You are given an array of binary strings strs and two integers m and n. The goal is to determine the size of the largest subset of strs such that the subset contains at most m 0's and n 1's in total.
A set x is a subset of a set y if all elements of x are also present in y. For each binary string in the array, count the number of 0's and 1's, and choose a subset where the total number of 0's does not exceed m and the total number of 1's does not exceed n.
Examples
Example 1
Input: strs = ["10","0001","111001","1","0"], m = 5, n = 3
Output: 4
The largest subset with at most 5 0's and 3 1's is {"10", "0001", "1", "0"}, so the answer is 4. Other valid but smaller subsets include {"0001", "1"} and {"10", "1", "0"}. {"111001"} is an invalid subset because it contains 4 1's, greater than the maximum of 3.
Example 2
Input: strs = ["10","0","1"], m = 1, n = 1
Output: 2
The largest subset is {"0", "1"}, so the answer is 2.
Constraints
- 1 <= strs.length <= 600
- 1 <= strs[i].length <= 100
- strs[i] consists only of digits '0' and '1'.
- 1 <= m, n <= 100
Solution Approach
Dynamic Programming State Transition
Use dynamic programming with a state transition approach. Create a 2D DP table where each entry dp[i][j] represents the maximum subset size with i 0's and j 1's. Transition through each binary string and update the DP table by considering the number of 0's and 1's in the string. This allows you to evaluate the largest subset with the constraints on 0's and 1's.
Space Optimization
Since the current DP table only depends on the previous row, optimize the space complexity by using a 1D DP array. This reduces the space usage from O(m * n) to O(n) by updating the array in reverse order to avoid overwriting values prematurely.
Subset Consideration
Iterate through all the binary strings, and for each, determine how it can contribute to the current DP state. This process involves checking if including the string violates the constraints on 0's and 1's and, if valid, updating the DP table to maximize the subset size.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
The time complexity of this problem depends on the final approach but typically falls within O(m * n * k), where k is the number of strings and m and n are the given constraints for 0's and 1's. The space complexity can be optimized to O(m * n) using dynamic programming. If space optimization is used, it reduces to O(n).
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Look for clear understanding of dynamic programming concepts.
- Check for efficient space optimization techniques in DP.
- Evaluate ability to break down a problem into manageable subproblems.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Overcomplicating the DP state transitions or failing to properly update the table.
- Ignoring the space complexity aspect and using an overly large DP table.
- Misunderstanding the problem constraints, especially in counting 0's and 1's.
Follow-up variants
- Consider variations with additional constraints, like limiting the number of binary strings that can be selected.
- Modify the problem by changing the allowed counts of 0's and 1's or adding more characters to the binary strings.
- Test how the solution handles larger inputs and evaluate performance scalability.
FAQ
How can dynamic programming help solve the Ones and Zeroes problem?
Dynamic programming helps by breaking the problem down into smaller subproblems, where the solution to each subproblem depends on the previous state. This is useful in optimizing the subset selection process while keeping track of the constraints on 0's and 1's.
What is the space optimization strategy for Ones and Zeroes?
Space optimization can be achieved by using a 1D DP array instead of a 2D table. This allows you to reduce the space complexity from O(m * n) to O(n) by updating the array in reverse order.
Can this problem be solved without dynamic programming?
While a brute force solution is possible, it is inefficient due to its high time complexity. Dynamic programming offers a much more efficient approach for solving the problem within the given constraints.
What is the time complexity of the Ones and Zeroes problem?
The time complexity of the solution is O(m * n * k), where m and n are the constraints on 0's and 1's, and k is the number of binary strings. This complexity comes from the need to iterate through each string and update the DP table.
How do I handle the edge cases for this problem?
Edge cases involve situations like empty strings, strings with only 0's or only 1's, or constraints where m or n is small. Make sure to properly handle such cases by checking the current DP state before updating it.
Solution
Solution 1: Dynamic Programming
We define $f[i][j][k]$ as the maximum number of strings that can be obtained from the first $i$ strings using $j$ zeros and $k$ ones. Initially, $f[i][j][k]=0$, and the answer is $f[sz][m][n]$, where $sz$ is the length of the array $strs$.
class Solution:
def findMaxForm(self, strs: List[str], m: int, n: int) -> int:
sz = len(strs)
f = [[[0] * (n + 1) for _ in range(m + 1)] for _ in range(sz + 1)]
for i, s in enumerate(strs, 1):
a, b = s.count("0"), s.count("1")
for j in range(m + 1):
for k in range(n + 1):
f[i][j][k] = f[i - 1][j][k]
if j >= a and k >= b:
f[i][j][k] = max(f[i][j][k], f[i - 1][j - a][k - b] + 1)
return f[sz][m][n]Solution 2: Dynamic Programming (Space Optimization)
We notice that the calculation of $f[i][j][k]$ only depends on $f[i-1][j][k]$ and $f[i-1][j-a][k-b]$. Therefore, we can eliminate the first dimension and optimize the space complexity to $O(m \times n)$.
class Solution:
def findMaxForm(self, strs: List[str], m: int, n: int) -> int:
sz = len(strs)
f = [[[0] * (n + 1) for _ in range(m + 1)] for _ in range(sz + 1)]
for i, s in enumerate(strs, 1):
a, b = s.count("0"), s.count("1")
for j in range(m + 1):
for k in range(n + 1):
f[i][j][k] = f[i - 1][j][k]
if j >= a and k >= b:
f[i][j][k] = max(f[i][j][k], f[i - 1][j - a][k - b] + 1)
return f[sz][m][n]Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
State transition dynamic programming
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward