LeetCode Problem Workspace
Minimum Operations to Make Array Equal II
Calculate the minimum operations to make two integer arrays equal using greedy adjustments with modular checks efficiently.
3
Topics
7
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Greedy choice plus invariant validation
Answer-first summary
Calculate the minimum operations to make two integer arrays equal using greedy adjustments with modular checks efficiently.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Greedy choice plus invariant validation
This problem requires computing the minimum number of operations to make nums1 identical to nums2 using a specific greedy operation. We analyze differences modulo k and balance surplus and deficit elements. If the differences cannot be reconciled with k, the function returns -1, otherwise the minimal operation count is derived.
Problem Statement
You are given two integer arrays nums1 and nums2 of the same length n, along with an integer k. You can perform operations that increase one element in nums1 by k while decreasing another by k in a single move.
The goal is to make nums1 exactly equal to nums2 at all indices. Return the minimum number of operations needed. If it is impossible to equalize the arrays due to modular incompatibility or imbalance, return -1.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums1 = [4,3,1,4], nums2 = [1,3,7,1], k = 3
Output: 2
In 2 operations, we can transform nums1 to nums2. 1st operation: i = 2, j = 0. After applying the operation, nums1 = [1,3,4,4]. 2nd operation: i = 2, j = 3. After applying the operation, nums1 = [1,3,7,1]. One can prove that it is impossible to make arrays equal in fewer operations.
Example 2
Input: nums1 = [3,8,5,2], nums2 = [2,4,1,6], k = 1
Output: -1
It can be proved that it is impossible to make the two arrays equal.
Constraints
- n == nums1.length == nums2.length
- 2 <= n <= 105
- 0 <= nums1[i], nums2[j] <= 109
- 0 <= k <= 105
Solution Approach
Compute Differences and Check Modulo
For each index, calculate the difference nums1[i] - nums2[i]. If the difference modulo k is not zero, it is impossible to balance, so return -1 immediately. This ensures the greedy operation is feasible.
Balance Surplus and Deficit
Sum the positive differences as surplus and negative differences as deficit. The greedy choice is to apply operations that reduce surplus while increasing deficit until both reach zero. The total operations are the sum of absolute differences divided by k.
Return Result
If after processing all elements, the surplus equals the deficit in absolute value, return the total operations. Otherwise, return -1. This step validates the invariant that operations maintain overall balance.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n) because each element is processed once for difference and balancing checks. Space complexity is O(1) beyond input storage since only counters for surplus, deficit, and operations are maintained.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Ask about cases where differences cannot be reconciled due to modulo k incompatibility.
- Check whether the candidate correctly computes total operations by summing divided differences.
- Listen for explanation of greedy balancing between surplus and deficit elements.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Ignoring the modulo k check before attempting operations leads to incorrect results.
- Summing positive and negative differences without considering k may produce fractional operations.
- Failing to verify that total surplus equals total deficit can return impossible counts.
Follow-up variants
- Change the operation to allow multiple indices simultaneously and analyze minimal total moves.
- Restrict k to 1 and study performance on very large arrays, focusing on greedy correctness.
- Allow nums1 and nums2 to contain negative numbers and observe modular arithmetic adjustments.
FAQ
What is the main pattern used in Minimum Operations to Make Array Equal II?
The problem follows a greedy choice plus invariant validation pattern, focusing on balancing surplus and deficit differences modulo k.
Why do we check differences modulo k?
Checking modulo k ensures each difference can be resolved with integer operations; if any difference is not divisible by k, the arrays cannot be equalized.
How do we calculate the minimal number of operations?
Sum all positive differences and divide by k; this represents the least operations needed to transfer surplus to deficits efficiently.
Can this approach handle large arrays efficiently?
Yes, because it only requires a single pass over the arrays to compute differences and sum operations, giving O(n) time complexity.
What common mistakes should I avoid?
Common mistakes include skipping modulo checks, not balancing surplus with deficit correctly, and miscounting operations when differences are not aligned with k.
Solution
Solution 1: Single Pass
We use a variable $x$ to record the difference in the number of additions and subtractions, and a variable $ans$ to record the number of operations.
class Solution:
def minOperations(self, nums1: List[int], nums2: List[int], k: int) -> int:
ans = x = 0
for a, b in zip(nums1, nums2):
if k == 0:
if a != b:
return -1
continue
if (a - b) % k:
return -1
y = (a - b) // k
ans += abs(y)
x += y
return -1 if x else ans // 2Continue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Greedy choice plus invariant validation
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward