LeetCode Problem Workspace
Minimum Length of String After Operations
Find the minimum length of a string after performing operations based on character frequency.
3
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Hash Table plus String
Answer-first summary
Find the minimum length of a string after performing operations based on character frequency.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Hash Table plus String
To solve this problem, iterate through the string to track character frequencies and then determine how the string can be minimized by removing pairs. The goal is to optimize operations to achieve the smallest string possible using counting. The key to efficiency is focusing only on the frequency of each character.
Problem Statement
You are given a string s consisting of lowercase English letters. You can perform the following operation as many times as you want: remove any pair of adjacent characters that are the same. Return the minimum possible length of the string after performing all possible operations.
In each operation, you can only remove adjacent matching pairs, and the frequency of each character determines if a pair can be removed. If no more pairs can be removed, return the length of the resulting string.
Examples
Example 1
Input: s = "abaacbcbb"
Output: 5
We do the following operations:
Example 2
Input: s = "aa"
Output: 2
We cannot perform any operations, so we return the length of the original string.
Constraints
- 1 <= s.length <= 2 * 105
- s consists only of lowercase English letters.
Solution Approach
Track character frequencies
Use a hash table to count the frequency of each character in the string. This will help in determining which characters can potentially form pairs for removal.
Process string for adjacent pairs
Iterate through the string and remove adjacent pairs of characters. Update the string after each removal to continually minimize the length.
Final string length determination
After all removals, the remaining string's length will be the answer. This can be computed by comparing the frequency of characters after all possible pair removals.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n) |
| Space | O(1) |
The time complexity is O(n) since we iterate through the string a constant number of times, and space complexity is O(1) as we only use a fixed amount of space for counting characters.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Can the candidate quickly implement a solution using a hash table to count frequencies?
- Does the candidate consider all edge cases like an already minimal string or no removable pairs?
- Is the candidate aware of the importance of focusing only on character frequencies for an optimized solution?
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Ignoring edge cases where no adjacent pairs exist and not optimizing for a direct frequency-based solution.
- Incorrectly handling cases with an odd number of identical characters that can’t fully form pairs.
- Overcomplicating the solution by attempting to manually remove pairs instead of focusing on character frequencies.
Follow-up variants
- What happens if the string is composed entirely of unique characters?
- Can this problem be solved using a stack approach instead of hash tables?
- How does the time complexity change when considering strings of varying lengths or different characters?
FAQ
How do hash tables help in solving the Minimum Length of String After Operations problem?
Hash tables store the frequency of each character, which is essential for determining if adjacent pairs can be removed. This allows for an efficient solution.
What are the time and space complexities for this problem?
The time complexity is O(n), and the space complexity is O(1), as only a fixed amount of space is needed for frequency counting.
What’s the key to efficiently solving this problem?
The key is focusing on character frequencies and using a hash table to track them, minimizing the string through pair removal based on these frequencies.
Can this problem be solved using a stack approach?
Yes, a stack could potentially be used to remove adjacent pairs, but a hash table-based approach is more efficient in terms of frequency counting.
How do I handle edge cases in the Minimum Length of String After Operations?
Edge cases include strings that already have no adjacent pairs or strings where characters cannot fully form pairs. Ensure you account for these scenarios during implementation.
Solution
Solution 1: Counting
We can count the occurrences of each character in the string, and then iterate through the count array. If a character appears an odd number of times, then $1$ of that character remains in the end; if a character appears an even number of times, then $2$ of that character remain. We can sum the remaining counts of all characters to get the final length of the string.
class Solution:
def minimumLength(self, s: str) -> int:
cnt = Counter(s)
return sum(1 if x & 1 else 2 for x in cnt.values())Continue Topic
hash table
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Hash Table plus String
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward