LeetCode Problem Workspace
Find the Punishment Number of an Integer
Find the punishment number of a given integer using backtracking search with pruning.
2
Topics
5
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Backtracking search with pruning
Answer-first summary
Find the punishment number of a given integer using backtracking search with pruning.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Backtracking search with pruning
The punishment number of an integer n is the sum of squares of integers i that meet a specific partition condition. You can efficiently find the punishment number through a backtracking search, where each valid partition of the square is checked. This problem leverages backtracking with pruning to explore all valid solutions.
Problem Statement
Given a positive integer n, you are tasked with finding the punishment number of n. The punishment number is defined as the sum of squares of all integers i within the range [1, n] that satisfy a specific condition. The condition is that the square of i must be partitioned in such a way that the sum of the resulting digits equals i itself.
For example, for n = 10, the punishment number is 182. The valid integers i in the range [1, 10] are 1, 9, and 10, as their squares can be split into digits whose sum matches i. The sum of their squares (1 + 81 + 100) gives the punishment number.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 10
Output: 182
There are exactly 3 integers i in the range [1, 10] that satisfy the conditions in the statement:
- 1 since 1 * 1 = 1
- 9 since 9 * 9 = 81 and 81 can be partitioned into 8 and 1 with a sum equal to 8 + 1 == 9.
- 10 since 10 * 10 = 100 and 100 can be partitioned into 10 and 0 with a sum equal to 10 + 0 == 10. Hence, the punishment number of 10 is 1 + 81 + 100 = 182
Example 2
Input: n = 37
Output: 1478
There are exactly 4 integers i in the range [1, 37] that satisfy the conditions in the statement:
- 1 since 1 * 1 = 1.
- 9 since 9 * 9 = 81 and 81 can be partitioned into 8 + 1.
- 10 since 10 * 10 = 100 and 100 can be partitioned into 10 + 0.
- 36 since 36 * 36 = 1296 and 1296 can be partitioned into 1 + 29 + 6. Hence, the punishment number of 37 is 1 + 81 + 100 + 1296 = 1478
Constraints
- 1 <= n <= 1000
Solution Approach
Backtracking Search with Pruning
A backtracking approach is used to explore all integers i in the range [1, n]. For each i, check if its square can be partitioned into digits that sum to i. Use pruning to eliminate unnecessary branches where the partitioning fails.
Digit Partitioning
For each square, partition it into all possible digit combinations. Check if the sum of the digits equals the original integer i. This is the key condition for including i in the punishment number sum.
Efficient Checking with Constraints
To optimize, avoid recalculating for the same integers and skip over unnecessary checks using constraints. This ensures the algorithm performs efficiently within the given bounds (1 <= n <= 1000).
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(n \cdot 2^{\log_{10}(n)}) |
| Space | O({\log_{10}(n)}) |
The time complexity of this solution is O(n * 2^{log_{10}(n)}) due to the backtracking exploration of possible partitions for each square. The space complexity is O(log_{10}(n)) as we store the partitioned digits in a recursive call stack.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Assess how well the candidate handles backtracking and partitioning problems.
- Evaluate if the candidate can optimize the search using pruning techniques.
- Check if the candidate understands the digit partitioning requirement and how to check it efficiently.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to properly partition the square of i and check the digit sum.
- Not implementing pruning, leading to inefficient solutions for larger n.
- Overlooking constraints and trying to solve for larger values of n without optimization.
Follow-up variants
- Allow n to be larger (e.g., up to 10000), requiring more efficient partitioning checks.
- Allow non-positive integers as input, modifying the conditions accordingly.
- Implement the problem using dynamic programming to reduce redundant calculations.
FAQ
What is the punishment number of an integer?
The punishment number is the sum of the squares of integers i in the range [1, n] that satisfy the condition where the sum of the digits of i^2 equals i.
How do you efficiently solve the punishment number problem?
You can use backtracking with pruning to explore valid integer candidates and check their square partitions for digit sums.
What is the time complexity of the punishment number problem?
The time complexity is O(n * 2^{log_{10}(n)}) due to backtracking and partition checking.
What are the key pitfalls in solving the punishment number problem?
Common pitfalls include failing to partition squares correctly, not implementing pruning, and inefficient handling of large inputs.
What pattern does the punishment number problem follow?
The problem follows a backtracking search with pruning pattern, where you explore valid partitions and optimize the search space.
Solution
Solution 1: Enumeration + DFS
We enumerate $i$, where $1 \leq i \leq n$. For each $i$, we split the decimal representation string of $x = i^2$, and then check whether it meets the requirements of the problem. If it does, we add $x$ to the answer.
class Solution:
def punishmentNumber(self, n: int) -> int:
def check(s: str, i: int, x: int) -> bool:
m = len(s)
if i >= m:
return x == 0
y = 0
for j in range(i, m):
y = y * 10 + int(s[j])
if y > x:
break
if check(s, j + 1, x - y):
return True
return False
ans = 0
for i in range(1, n + 1):
x = i * i
if check(str(x), 0, i):
ans += x
return ansContinue Topic
math
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Backtracking search with pruning
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward