LeetCode Problem Workspace
Element Appearing More Than 25% In Sorted Array
Identify the integer occurring more than 25% in a sorted array using a precise array-driven search strategy for efficiency.
1
Topics
7
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Easy · Array-driven solution strategy
Answer-first summary
Identify the integer occurring more than 25% in a sorted array using a precise array-driven search strategy for efficiency.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array-driven solution strategy
This problem asks to return the unique integer that occurs more than 25% of the time in a sorted array. The solution leverages the sorted property, dividing the array into quarters and checking potential candidates at key indices. By scanning limited positions, you can determine the result in constant space and logarithmic time.
Problem Statement
Given a non-decreasing sorted integer array, exactly one element appears in more than 25% of the array. Your task is to return that element efficiently.
For example, in an array [1,2,2,6,6,6,6,7,10], the integer 6 occurs more than 25% of the time. Similarly, in [1,1], the integer 1 satisfies the condition. Arrays will always meet the constraints 1 <= arr.length <= 104 and 0 <= arr[i] <= 105.
Examples
Example 1
Input: arr = [1,2,2,6,6,6,6,7,10]
Output: 6
Example details omitted.
Example 2
Input: arr = [1,1]
Output: 1
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 1 <= arr.length <= 104
- 0 <= arr[i] <= 105
Solution Approach
Quarter Index Candidate Check
Divide the array into four equal segments and examine elements at indices n/4, n/2, and 3n/4. Since the repeating element occupies more than 25%, it must appear at one of these key positions, allowing immediate identification without scanning the entire array.
Count Verification
Once a candidate is selected from quarter positions, count its occurrences by scanning adjacent positions. The first candidate exceeding n/4 confirms the answer, leveraging the sorted property to skip irrelevant sections efficiently.
Optimized Single Pass
Combine candidate selection and verification by comparing element values at quarter indices with their neighbors. This ensures O(log n) time and O(1) space usage, avoiding full linear scans and unnecessary temporary storage.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | O(\log{}n) |
| Space | O(1) |
Time complexity is O(log n) because we only check a constant number of quarter positions rather than the whole array. Space complexity is O(1) as no extra data structures are used beyond index variables.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Candidates at quarter indices often reveal the element exceeding 25% frequency.
- Sorting guarantees that any valid element will span multiple quarter boundaries.
- Linear scans across all indices are unnecessary and may indicate inefficiency.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Failing to use sorted property and checking all elements linearly instead of quarter indices.
- Miscounting occurrences when the repeating element is near segment boundaries.
- Assuming multiple elements could exceed 25% instead of leveraging the problem's unique element guarantee.
Follow-up variants
- Find an element appearing more than 33% in a sorted array, adjusting index checks accordingly.
- Handle arrays where multiple elements appear frequently but only one exceeds 25%, ensuring correctness.
- Apply similar quarter-based search for strings in a sorted list to find the dominant string.
FAQ
What is the best approach for Element Appearing More Than 25% In Sorted Array?
Focus on the array's sorted property, check elements at quarter indices, and verify counts, avoiding full linear scans.
Why does checking quarter indices work for this problem?
Any element appearing more than 25% must cross at least one quarter boundary, making these indices guaranteed candidates.
Can we use extra data structures like hash maps?
While possible, they are unnecessary. The sorted array allows O(1) space solutions using index-based checks.
What if the array is very small?
For arrays smaller than 4 elements, directly compare counts of each element since quarter indices may overlap.
Does this approach generalize to different thresholds?
Yes, adjust the segment divisions according to the target frequency, e.g., thirds for >33%, ensuring candidates fall within boundary indices.
Solution
Solution 1: Traversal
We traverse the array $\textit{arr}$ from the beginning. For each element $\textit{arr}[i]$, we check if $\textit{arr}[i]$ is equal to $\textit{arr}[i + \left\lfloor \frac{n}{4} \right\rfloor]$, where $n$ is the length of the array. If they are equal, then $\textit{arr}[i]$ is the element we are looking for, and we return it directly.
class Solution:
def findSpecialInteger(self, arr: List[int]) -> int:
n = len(arr)
for i, x in enumerate(arr):
if x == arr[(i + (n >> 2))]:
return xContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array-driven solution strategy
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Easy
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward