LeetCode Problem Workspace
Count Unhappy Friends
Determine the number of unhappy friends in paired arrangements using array-based simulation for preference violations.
2
Topics
6
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Medium · Array plus Simulation
Answer-first summary
Determine the number of unhappy friends in paired arrangements using array-based simulation for preference violations.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array plus Simulation
This problem requires calculating unhappy friends by analyzing each friend's preferences against their current pairings. Use an array-based simulation to quickly rank preferences and check for violations where a friend prefers someone else who also prefers them. Efficiently handling comparisons with a precomputed ranking matrix ensures O(1) checks for each friend pairing and avoids redundant iterations.
Problem Statement
You are given n friends labeled from 0 to n-1, where n is always even. Each friend has a list of preferences indicating other friends in order of most to least preferred. All friends are grouped into pairs provided in the list pairs, where each pair consists of two friends.
A friend x is considered unhappy if there exists another friend u such that x prefers u over their current partner y, and u also prefers x over their current partner v. The goal is to compute the total number of unhappy friends in the given pairings according to these preference rules.
Examples
Example 1
Input: n = 4, preferences = [[1, 2, 3], [3, 2, 0], [3, 1, 0], [1, 2, 0]], pairs = [[0, 1], [2, 3]]
Output: 2
Friend 1 is unhappy because:
- 1 is paired with 0 but prefers 3 over 0, and
- 3 prefers 1 over 2. Friend 3 is unhappy because:
- 3 is paired with 2 but prefers 1 over 2, and
- 1 prefers 3 over 0. Friends 0 and 2 are happy.
Example 2
Input: n = 2, preferences = [[1], [0]], pairs = [[1, 0]]
Output: 0
Both friends 0 and 1 are happy.
Example 3
Input: n = 4, preferences = [[1, 3, 2], [2, 3, 0], [1, 3, 0], [0, 2, 1]], pairs = [[1, 3], [0, 2]]
Output: 4
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 2 <= n <= 500
- n is even.
- preferences.length == n
- preferences[i].length == n - 1
- 0 <= preferences[i][j] <= n - 1
- preferences[i] does not contain i.
- All values in preferences[i] are unique.
- pairs.length == n/2
- pairs[i].length == 2
- xi != yi
- 0 <= xi, yi <= n - 1
- Each person is contained in exactly one pair.
Solution Approach
Precompute Preference Ranks
Create a rank matrix where rank[i][j] indicates the preference order of friend j for friend i. This allows O(1) lookup to determine if a friend prefers someone over their current partner.
Iterate Over Pairs
For each friend x, check every other friend u to see if x prefers u over their pair and if u prefers x over their own pair. Count x as unhappy if both conditions hold.
Aggregate Unhappy Counts
Use a boolean array to mark unhappy friends while iterating. Finally, sum all marked friends to get the total number of unhappy friends, ensuring no double counting and respecting the array simulation structure.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n^2) due to checking each friend against all others using the precomputed rank matrix. Space complexity is O(n^2) for the rank matrix and O(n) for the boolean tracking array.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Asks about handling preference violations efficiently using arrays.
- Checks if candidate recognizes the need for O(1) preference lookups via a rank matrix.
- Probes understanding of double counting avoidance in simulation loops.
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Forgetting to check mutual preference condition when determining unhappiness.
- Iterating over pairs inefficiently instead of using rank matrix for O(1) comparisons.
- Double counting unhappy friends by not tracking marked status properly.
Follow-up variants
- Changing pairings dynamically and recomputing unhappy friends.
- Adding weighted preferences to compute most unhappy friends.
- Extending to n being odd with a single unpaired friend and adjusting rules accordingly.
FAQ
What is the best approach for Count Unhappy Friends?
Use an array-based simulation with a rank matrix to allow O(1) preference comparisons between friends.
Can this be solved without a rank matrix?
Yes, but checking preferences each time would increase time complexity to O(n^3), which is inefficient.
How do you avoid counting a friend twice as unhappy?
Use a boolean array to mark each unhappy friend and sum marked entries at the end.
Is this problem only about array simulation?
Yes, the primary pattern is Array plus Simulation to efficiently evaluate preference violations among pairs.
What are common mistakes in implementing Count Unhappy Friends?
Forgetting mutual preference checks, inefficiently iterating over all friends, or double counting unhappy friends.
Solution
Solution 1: Enumeration
We use an array $\textit{d}$ to record the closeness between each pair of friends, where $\textit{d}[i][j]$ represents the closeness of friend $i$ to friend $j$ (the smaller the value, the closer they are). Additionally, we use an array $\textit{p}$ to record the paired friend for each friend.
class Solution:
def unhappyFriends(
self, n: int, preferences: List[List[int]], pairs: List[List[int]]
) -> int:
d = [{x: j for j, x in enumerate(p)} for p in preferences]
p = {}
for x, y in pairs:
p[x] = y
p[y] = x
ans = 0
for x in range(n):
y = p[x]
for i in range(d[x][y]):
u = preferences[x][i]
v = p[u]
if d[u][x] < d[u][v]:
ans += 1
break
return ansContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array plus Simulation
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Medium
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward