LeetCode Problem Workspace
Adjacent Increasing Subarrays Detection I
Check if an array contains two adjacent strictly increasing subarrays of length k using an array-driven approach efficiently.
1
Topics
7
Code langs
3
Related
Practice Focus
Easy · Array-driven solution strategy
Answer-first summary
Check if an array contains two adjacent strictly increasing subarrays of length k using an array-driven approach efficiently.
Ace coding interviews with Interview AiBoxInterview AiBox guidance for Array-driven solution strategy
Start by iterating through the array while tracking lengths of increasing sequences. Record each strictly increasing subarray of length k and check if two of them are adjacent. This approach leverages array scanning and avoids unnecessary nested loops, focusing on exact subarray positions to ensure correctness and efficiency in detecting consecutive increasing patterns.
Problem Statement
Given an array nums of n integers and an integer k, determine whether two adjacent subarrays of length k exist such that both subarrays are strictly increasing. Adjacent means the first subarray ends immediately before the second starts, and each subarray contains elements in strictly increasing order.
Return true if such two adjacent increasing subarrays exist; otherwise, return false. For example, given nums = [2,5,7,8,9,2,3,4,3,1] with k = 3, the output should be true because [5,7,8] and [7,8,9] are consecutive increasing subarrays of length 3. If no such pairs exist, return false.
Examples
Example 1
Input: nums = [2,5,7,8,9,2,3,4,3,1], k = 3
Output: true
Example 2
Input: nums = [1,2,3,4,4,4,4,5,6,7], k = 5
Output: false
Example details omitted.
Constraints
- 2 <= nums.length <= 100
- 1 < 2 * k <= nums.length
- -1000 <= nums[i] <= 1000
Solution Approach
Scan and Track Increasing Lengths
Iterate through nums and maintain a counter for the length of the current strictly increasing sequence. Reset the counter when a non-increasing element is encountered. This allows identification of all subarrays of length k without nested loops.
Record Valid Subarray Indices
Whenever an increasing sequence reaches length k, record its starting index. Maintain a list of these indices and check for adjacent pairs where the end of one subarray is immediately before the start of another.
Check Adjacency for Result
Compare consecutive recorded subarray indices to see if any two are exactly k elements apart. If such a pair exists, return true. Otherwise, return false after the scan completes.
Complexity Analysis
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Time | Depends on the final approach |
| Space | Depends on the final approach |
Time complexity is O(n) because each element is processed once while tracking increasing sequences. Space complexity is O(n) in the worst case to store valid subarray starting indices, but can be reduced by checking adjacency on the fly.
What Interviewers Usually Probe
- Expecting array traversal without nested loops
- Looking for handling of overlapping subarrays correctly
- Checking for attention to edge cases like k near n/2
Common Pitfalls or Variants
Common pitfalls
- Confusing non-strictly increasing sequences as valid
- Not handling overlapping subarrays correctly
- Using nested loops leading to unnecessary O(n*k) complexity
Follow-up variants
- Detect adjacent decreasing subarrays of length k
- Find three consecutive increasing subarrays
- Check for subarrays with at least k increasing elements
FAQ
What is the pattern behind Adjacent Increasing Subarrays Detection I?
It focuses on detecting two consecutive subarrays of length k where each subarray is strictly increasing, leveraging array scanning.
Can k equal half of nums length?
Yes, as long as 1 < 2*k <= nums.length, the algorithm correctly handles edge cases.
How do overlapping subarrays affect detection?
Overlapping is allowed only if the subarrays are strictly adjacent; GhostInterview ensures adjacency is checked precisely.
What is the time complexity of this solution?
It is O(n) because each element is scanned once to track increasing sequences and record valid subarrays.
Does this problem require extra space for tracking?
You can store starting indices of increasing subarrays, but checking adjacency on the fly can reduce space usage.
Solution
Solution 1: Single Pass
According to the problem description, we only need to find the maximum length of adjacent increasing subarrays $\textit{mx}$. If $\textit{mx} \ge k$, then there exist two adjacent strictly increasing subarrays of length $k$.
class Solution:
def hasIncreasingSubarrays(self, nums: List[int], k: int) -> bool:
mx = pre = cur = 0
for i, x in enumerate(nums):
cur += 1
if i == len(nums) - 1 or x >= nums[i + 1]:
mx = max(mx, cur // 2, min(pre, cur))
pre, cur = cur, 0
return mx >= kContinue Topic
array
Practice more edge cases under the same topic.
arrow_forwardauto_awesomeContinue Pattern
Array-driven solution strategy
Expand the same solving frame across more problems.
arrow_forwardsignal_cellular_altSame Difficulty Track
Easy
Stay on this level to stabilize interview delivery.
arrow_forward